DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: mh
Docket No: 439-99
25 May 1999
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 15 April 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members
6f the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
l
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720
INTEDRITY DRIVE
YILLINDTOW TN
38055-0000
1160
NPC-815
15 Apr 99
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:
NPC-OOZCB
Subj:
Ref:
BCNR PETITION ICO MM2
USN,
SNM's DD Form 149
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
148/98
253/98
dtd 07 Jan 99
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
1.
petitioner's request.
In response to reference
.
(a), recommend disapproval of
- Petitioner reenlisted on 15
Ott 1998 for four years and
received the maximum zone "B"
NEC 5326 offered in reference (b). Petitioner's EAOS at the time
was 21 May 1999.
SRB entitlement of
$20,000.00 for
- Reference (c),
of 01
$30,000.00 for NEC 5326.
Dee 1998 offered the maximum zone "B" SRB entitlement of
released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date
- Petitioner requests that his SRB computation to be
$30,000.00 for the zone "B" SRB
recomputed for NEC 5326 at
reenlistment of 15
Ott 1998.
- Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15
Ott
Therefore the petitioner could not have been
1998 reenlistment.
counseled concerning the higher ceiling of
(c) prior to the reenlistment.
counseled concerning SRB obliserve prior to the reenlistment.
Petitioner was not improperly
$30,0000 in reference
In view of the above,
recommend petitioner's record remain as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use
(BCNR) only.
3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records
Enclosure (1) is returned.
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03533-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Jun 1998 for 4 years and received the maximum zone "B" SRB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00375-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.