Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:mh
Docket No: 193-99
25 May 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 5 May 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
contained in
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
L
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
MILLINGTON
TN 38055-000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
E
0
IN REPLY REFER TO
1160
NPC-815
05 May 99
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Via:
NPC-OOZCB
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO STS3
USN,
Ref:
Encl:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 04 Jan 99
(b) Career Schools List (CSL) dtg
091013z
Jul 98
(1) NPC 403
(2) BCNR File
ltr of response dtd 21 Apr 99
In response to reference (a) and after review of enclosure
1.
(l), recommend disapproval of petitioner's request.
- Petitioner reenlisted for five years on 20 Mar 1998.
Petitioner received a zone
"A" SRB entitlement for the STS rate.
- Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998
reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit
under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and
Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT.
(l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at
- Per enclosure
However, in reference (b) the
the time petitioner reenlisted.
CSL carried the Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training for
automatic advancement upon the date of reenlistment under the
STAR program.
- Petitioner could not have been advised concerning reference (b)
prior to his reenlistment.
sufficient grounds to change the reenlistment of 20 Mar 1998 to
reflect a STAR reenlistment with an automatic advancement to
paygrade E5.
Petitioner's hindsight is not
In view of the above,
recommend petitioner's record remain as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(2) is returned.
'Enclosure
,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAW PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720
INTEDRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN
2805 S-0000
5420
Ser
APR 2
403
/lb4
I 1999
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR
NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-OOXCB)
CORRECTION OF
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-3CB)
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN
CASE OF
STS3(SS)
USN,
(a) BUPERS Washington DC 1609502 MAR 98 (STS
Class
\\ C”
(b) CNO Washington DC 0910132 JUL 98 (Career Schools
Schools)
Listing (CSL) Changes)
(c) BUPERS Request Docket
Subject member has petitioned the BCNR requesting Selective
1.
Training and Reenlistment (STAR) while stationed at NAVSUBSCOL,
Groton CT.
counseled on reference (a) while obtaining obligated service for
AN/BQQ-5E Advanced Maintenance and Operations
BUPERS orders to
Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT in April 1998.
His request specifies that he was not informed or
NPC-403 has reviewed the information available and based on
2.
this review,
the following is provided:
- The Sonar Technician Submarine (STS) rating had no
schools on the Career Schools List in March 1998.
- In March 1998,
reference (a) was released stating that
NPC-403 can authorize first term personnel advanced training.
This message recommended that service members take advantage of
the STAR program to maximize Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB)
and advancement.
- In July 1998,
AN/BQQ-SE Pipeline, was released to the fleet.
the revised CSL (reference (b)), containing
the
There would have been no way for any Command Career Counselor
3.
to predict the availability of STAR or NPC-403's authorization to
.
Subj:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN
CASE OF
STS3(SS)
USN,
provide advanced training to the STS rating.
are not required to advise service members on programs that are
not available or may be available at some point in the future.
Members who obtained obligated service through reenlistment prior
to the update of the CSL are not eligible for any provisions
provided under the STAR program.
instructions covering the programs in question.
All commands maintain
Career Counselors
Nuclz Power Assignments
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808650
- Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second eligibility back by reason of the STAR program. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00511-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Petitioner was an - Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 27 Feb 1998 under the STAR program and received a zone “A” SRB for this reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03355-99
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, petitioner d i ; l not initia1l.y reenlist under the STAR program, because at the ti!r!,: of r=.enlistrnent, the STS rate was not. T h i s i s a n a d v i s o r y memorandum t o r e f e r e n c e ( a ) f o r t h e u s e by t h e Board f o r C o r r e c t i o n of Naval Records ( P N R ) o n p .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Per reference (b), school or "C" C .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...