DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:mh
Docket No: 332-99
25 May 1999
SN
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1160 NPC-815 of 13 April 1999, a copy of which
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
l
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN
28055-0000
INTEDRITY DRIVE
5720
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:
NPC-OOZCB
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO MR3
,
USN,
1160
NPC-815
13 Apr 99
Ref:
DD Form 149
dtd 07 Jun 98
SNM's
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
(d) OPNAVINST
308/95
081/94
1160.6A
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference
1.
petitioner's request.
(a), recommend disapproval to
- Petitioner was discharged from Active Duty on 19 Aug 1994
Petitioner was in
paygrade E3
after three years of Naval service.
at the time of discharge.
- Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 01 Feb 1996.
Reference (b) did not carry an SRB entitlement for MR(OOOO) rate
at the time petitioner reenlisted.
- Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement
calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment
based on the date of discharge.
- Per reference (d),
members with broken-service must be a
petty officer in an SRB eligible rating/NEC.
are not eligible for broken-service SRB.
upon reenlistment on 01 Feb 1996.
computation is based upon the current NAVADMIN at the date of
reenlistment not the date of discharge.
Additionally,
Designated strikers
Petitioner was an MRFN
SRB eligibility
In view of the above,
recommend petitioner's record remain as
2.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.
Enclosure
Re&istment Incentives Branch
.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA “A” school training and receive the zone “C” SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...