DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 114% REPLY REFER TO
PERS-815
08 Jun 99
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-0OOZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO EN3 (i?_——CRooRCn. US\ , CRIT.
Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 30 Nov 98
(bo) MILPERSMAN 1160-100
(c) MILPERSMAN 1510-020
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of
petitioner’s request.
—~ Petitioner received a STAR reenlistment approval from PERS
292(815) on 02 Feb 1995.
-~ Petitioner reenlisted for 4 years on 13 Mar 1995 under the STAR
program to attend NEC 4398 “C” school (K-652-216) with an
completion date of 26 Sep 1995.
-~ Petitioner was automatically advanced to Petty Officer Second
Class upon completion of training. However, petitioner was
reduced back to Petty Officer Third Class when she reported on
board the USS BRISCOE.
- Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second
eligibility back by reason of the STAR program.
- Per references (b) and (c), automatic advancement under the
STAR program is not a guarantee. Automatic advancement
eligibility is based on the Career Schools List (CSL) in effect
on the date of reenlistment.
- On the date of petitioner’s reenlistment, the training which
petitioner completed was not listed on the CSL. The NEC which
petitioner holds (4398) was not listed on the CSL. Therefore,
petitioner is not eligible for the automatic advancement portion
of the STAR program.
2. In view of the above, recommend petitioner’s record remain as
1S
3. Enclosure (1) is returned.
Head, Réénlistment
Incentives Branch
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC: tj
Docket No: 8650-98
13 July 1999
Dear PETTY OFFICER gga
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 July 1999, Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 PERS-815 of 8 June 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Per reference (b), school or "C" C .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...