Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99
Original file (00792-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:mh
Docket No: 792-99
25 May 1999

PSC 87 BOX 4758
FPO AE 09617

USN

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum NPC-815 of 5 May 1999, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE

5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000

L

E

0

IN REPLY REFER T

O

1160
NIX-815
05 May 99

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:

NPC-OOZCB

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

BCNR 

PE,TITION ICO HM3

USN,

SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 08 

(a) 
(b) MILPERSMAN   1060020
(c) MILPERSMAN 1060021
(1) BCNR File

Ott 98

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to

- Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 18 Apr 1997.
Petitioner received a zone "A" SRB entitlement for HM(8482)
rate/NEC.

- Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 18 Apr 1997 to
reflect benefits of the STAR reenlistment program.

- Petitioner completed CIN B-312-0025 (8482) in December 1993.

CIN was not on CSL at the time petitioner reenlisted.

- IAW with reference (b),
if the "C" school or "C" school package the servicemember
completed was not listed on the Career Schools List in effect on
the date of reenlistment.
to receive an Automatic Advancement upon reenlistment of 18 Apr
1997.

Therefore, petitioner is not eligible

automatic advancement is not authorized

In view of the above,

recommend petitioner's record remain as

2.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by

3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.

Enclosure

Head,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00511-99

    Original file (00511-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Petitioner was an - Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 27 Feb 1998 under the STAR program and received a zone “A” SRB for this reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99

    Original file (00193-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07921-98

    Original file (07921-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the RMSS rate at the time petitioner reenlisted.