Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:mh
Docket No: 752-99
25 May 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-8 15 of 28 April 1999, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

NAVY PERSONNEL   COMMAND

5720 

IWTEDRITY  DRIVE

YILLIWDTON  TN 

3805 

5-0000

1160
NPC-815
28 Apr 99

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:

NPC-OOZCB

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

Ref:

BCNR PETITION ICO HM3

, 

USN,

SNM's DD Form 149

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 

047/98
253/98

dtd 3 Feb 99

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference

1.
petitioner's request.

(a),

recommend 

disapproval.of

- Petitioner reenlisted on 24 Apr 98 for four years to attend

Surgical Technologist school NEC   8483.
carry a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 8483 at the time
petitioner reenlisted.

Reference (b) did not

- Petitioner attended   8483 training from 02  

Feb 99.

Jul 

98 through  

08

of 1 

- Reference (c),
Dee 98 carried a zone
- Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 24 Apr

"B" SRB entitlement for NEC  8483.

released on  20 Nov 98  with an effective date

98 to reenlist for NEC   8483 at 
08 Feb 99 and receive the zone "B"
reference (c).

the completion date of training on

SRB entitlement offered in

- Petitioner was not improperly counseled concerning

to attending  NEC 8483 training
obliserve requirements prior
because reference (b) did not carry the SRB entitlement at the
time petitioner reenlisted.
's reenlistment on 24 Apr 98 as no error or
expunge petitioner
injustice was committed.

There is no sufficient grounds to

In view of the above,

recommend petitioner's record remain as

2.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use
of Naval Records  (BCNR) only.

3.
by the Board for Correction
Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98

    Original file (08501-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98

    Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Mon Jan 29 15_32_38 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.