Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
MEH:mh
Docket No: 8446-98
25 May 1999
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 13 April 1999, a copy of which
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
I
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN
38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
1160
NPC-815
13 Apr 99
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:
NPC-OOXCB
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
BCNR PETITION ICO
1,
RMl
,
USN ,
SNM's DD Form 149
dtd 16 Nov 98
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
180/97
047/98
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference
1.
petitioner's request.
(a),
recommend disapproval of
- Petitioner reenlisted on 05 Jan 1998 for four years to have
Petitioner's EAOS at
obliserve for orders to NEC 2379 training.
the time was 24 Jul 1998.
entitlement for the
reenlisted.
RM(2379)
Reference (b) did not carry a SRB
rate/NEC at the time petitioner
- Reference (c),
released 12 Mar 1998 with an effective date
of 01 Apr 1998 carried a zone "B" SRB entitlement for the
RM(2379) rate/NEC.
- Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 05
Jan 1998 to effect a reenlistment the date petitioner completed
NEC 2379 training on 22 Mar 1998 for six years and receive a zone
"B" SRB entitlement for the RM(2379) rate/NEC.
- NAVAL PERSONNEL COMMAND/OPNAV cannot provide information
pertaining to subsequent SRB
has been released.
counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.
Petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to expunge the
05 Jan 1998 reenlistment as no error or injustice was committed.
NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN
Therefore the petitioner could not have been
In view of the above,
recommend petitioner's record remain as
2.
is.
3.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a)
by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
Enclosure (1) is returned.
for use
only.
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00375-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...