Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00025
Original file (PD2010-00025.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: marine corps

CASE NUMBER: PD1000025 SEPARATION DATE: 19990331

BOARD DATE: 20111011 TDRL END DATE: 20030101

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve PV2 (Recruit) medically separated for a left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial meniscus tear repair with persistent chronic left knee pain. The initial injury occurred during a basic training accident in 1998. He did not respond adequately to treatment and was unable to complete training or to meet physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Tear, anterior cruciate ligament, left knee (with) complex tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (and) strain, medial meniscus ligament, left knee were forwarded on the NAVMED 6100/1 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the tear ACL, left knee, strain medial meniscus ligament left knee and complex tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with fragment displaced medially to the notch of the left knee posteriorly as unfitting, rated 30%, with application SECNAVINST 1850.4E and DoDI 1332.39 and recommended placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The CI made no appeals and was placed on TDRL with a 30% disability rating. At a periodic reevaluation on 16 October 2000, he was retained on TDRL status. The 18 October 2002 IPEB recommended permanent separation for left ACL reconstruction and medial meniscus tear repair with persistent chronic left knee pain with a 10% disability rating. Strain medial meniscus ligament left knee, complex tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus with fragment displaced medially to the notch of the left knee posteriorly and tear of the ACL, left knee were category II conditions (condition that contribute to the unfitting condition). The CI appealed the IPEB adjudication, and the Naval Council of Personnel Boards responded on 14 January 2003 that his case was closed in the PEB system and that he could petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records. There is no record that he pursued this option.

CI CONTENTION: “Disability rating seems to be too low for the impairment of the condition and does not seem to be on par with the scale used by the VA.”

RATING COMPARISON:

Final Service IPEB – Dated 20021021 VA* – All Effective 19990401
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
On TDRL – 19990301 TDRL Sep.
L ACL…Medial Meniscus Tear… Chronic L Knee Pain 5257 30% 10% ACL and Medial Meniscus Tear, L Knee 5257 30%**
Strain Medial Meniscus L Knee Cat II
Complex Tear Posterior Horn Of The Medial Meniscus…L Knee Posteriorly Cat II
Tear ACL L Knee Cat II
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ 0% x 0/Not Service Connected x 0
Final Combined: 10% Total Combined: 30%

* VA rating based on exam most proximate to date of permanent separation.

**Raised from 20% on additional information on 20001028; 100% after surgery and during recovery

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application, i.e., that there should be additional disability assigned for his other conditions and for the gravity of his condition and predictable consequences which merit consideration for a higher separation rating. While the Disability Evaluation System considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member's career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However, the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to periodically re-evaluate Veterans for the purpose of adjusting the disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time, and to compensate for all service connected conditions, without a tie to fitness.

Left ACL Reconstruction and Medial Meniscus Repair with Chronic Pain. The CI was four weeks into basic training when he twisted his left knee in pugil stick training. Orthopedic exam several weeks later noted a 1+ effusion with a 1+ Lachman test (i.e., positive anterior instability). No medial or lateral instability was noted. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a tear of the ACL and posterior horn of the medial meniscus with a fragment displaced toward the notch. There was also evidence of medial collateral ligament strain. It was determined that he would not be able to finish training in a reasonable period of time and MEB was recommended. Range of motion (ROM) was not documented, although at a previous appointment it was noted to be 30-115 degrees. He was placed on TDRL effective 1 April 1999 with a 30% disability rating. Two months later, the VA compensation and pension (C&P) exam on 3 June 1999 showed that he complained of swelling and used a brace. A slight limp was noted with the left knee brace. Mild muscle atrophy was noted below the knee. ROM of the right knee was noted to be within normal limits with extension from 0-100 degrees and flexion from 0-140 degrees. ROM of the left knee was slightly decreased with extension from 0-170 degrees and flexion from 0-140 degrees (these may represent typos). The drawers test was positive with slightly decreased motor strength. The CI was initially granted 20% disability for dislocation of the semilunar cartilage with pain and effusion on the 1 December 1999 VA rating decision. On review, the VA upheld this decision (3 February 2000 VA rating decision). The CI appealed, and the VA increased the disability rating to 30%. The VA granted 100% disability from 22 November 2000 to 31 January 2001 for recovery from surgery, but there is no record that the CI was reevaluated after the surgery. On 22 November 2000, the CI underwent left knee arthroscopy and had reconstruction of the ACL and a sub-total meniscectomy of the medial meniscus. The portion of the meniscus lodged in the notch was reduced and then debrided. He was next seen on 1 July 2002 when it was noted that he reinjured his knee after being struck by a drunk driver several months previously, not in the line of duty. He had problems with uneven surfaces and with kneeling. On exam, he was noted to have stability to valgus and varus stress with a negative Lachman’s with a definite endpoint. There was mild clicking on McMurray’s, but no lateral or medial joint line tenderness. A chart note of the second orthopedic exam for TDRL purposes, dated 29 July 2002, is illegible, but the report of the exam is included in the narrative summary. It was noted that he had persistent pain and could not run nor stand for prolonged periods of time. Full ROM was noted without effusion. Positive quadriceps inhibition was noted as was tenderness over the patellar facets. Minimal medial joint line tenderness was present without lateral joint line tenderness. The Lachman showed 5mm of laxity compared with 4mm of the unaffected right knee. Both had solid endpoints. There was no evidence of valgus or varus laxity. A civilian orthopedic exam dated 21 November 2002 noted full passive ROM, without effusion or deformity. Lachman and McMurray were negative. An apprehension test was positive and crepitus was present when rising from a squat. The left calf was 1 cm smaller than the right. The CI noted that he had continued popping and occasional giving way. The record reveals a history of occasional locking on the 3 June 1999 VA exam and also of the knee “popping” out of joint prior to surgery. Three goniometric examinations are available for review. Of the two proximate to TDRL entry, the physical therapy exam is more remote and still reflects the acute injury. Thus, the VA exam is thought to have higher probative value. There is only one exam proximate to TDRL exit.

Goniometric ROM

Knees

PT ~ 4 Mo. Pre-TDRL entry VA C&P ~ 2 Mo. After-TDRL entry

Ortho 29 Jul 02

5 Mo. Pre-TDRL exit

Left Left Left
Flexion (140⁰ normal) 115⁰ 140⁰ 135⁰
Extension (0⁰ normal) 30⁰ 0⁰ 0⁰
Comments Two weeks after acute injury; persistent swelling; unable to assess McMurray. This reduces the probative value of this exam. TTP, effusion; antalgic gait (favor left); + incoord rising from chair; no instability; no pain on motion; Flexion limited by body habitus;
§4.71a Rating 40% 10% 10%

The Board first considered the TDRL entry rating. It was noted that both the VA and PEB coded the condition as 5257 (knee, other impairment). The IPEB granted 30% disability. The VA awarded 20% initially, but raised the disability to 30% after review of additional information indicating further disability. The Board considered whether the knee instability rose to the level of moderate or severe and noted that the CI was able to function without a brace, albeit with increased pain. The Board also considered code 5258 (cartilage, semilunar, dislocated, with frequent episodes of “locking,” pain and effusion). The Board noted that while pain and effusions were noted, the locking was occasional. Therefore, the Board determined that the 30% disability rating for TDRL entry was appropriate. The Board next considered the permanent disability rating. It was noted that the exams proximate to TDRL exit documented no effusion and no objective instability although there was a history of occasional popping and giving way. The Board determined that the lack of objective instability with occasional subjective instability was more consistent with a slight disability rather than a moderate disability under code 5257. It was also noted that there was persistent pain after the partial meniscectomy. After due deliberation in consideration of the totality of the evidence, the Board unanimously concluded that there should be additional disability assigned under code 5259 (cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic) at a 10% rating in addition to the 10% assigned for code 5257 (recurrent subluxation or lateral instability).

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a separation rating of 10% for the left knee ACL condition coded 5257 and 10% for the medial meniscus condition coded 5259 for a combined rating of 20%.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left ACL Reconstruction with Instability 5257 10%
Symptomatic Removal of the Left Medial Meniscus 5259 10%
COMBINED 20%

______________________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20100112, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS

COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 17 Oct 11 ICO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(c) PDBR ltr dtd 25 Oct 11 ICO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(d) PDBR ltr dtd 27 Oct 11 ICO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(e) PDBR ltr dtd 27 Oct 11 ICO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(f) PDBR ltr dtd 20 Oct 11 ICO xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (f).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXX XX XXXX: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating (increased from 10 percent) effective 15 January 2006.

b. XXX XX XXXX: Separation from the Naval Service due to physical disability rated at 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective 1 December 2002.

c. XXX-XX-XXXX: Separation from the Naval Service due to physical disability rated at 10 percent (increased from 0 percent) effective 15 November 2004.

d. XXX XX XXXX: Placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List at 50 percent from 15 February 2008 through 14 August 2008 with final disability separation on 15 August 2008 with a 10 percent disability rating.

e. XXX XX 6809: Separation from the Naval Service due to physical disability rated at 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective 30 March 2009.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions and the subject members are notified once those actions are completed.

Assistant General Counsel

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737

    Original file (PD2011-00737.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00514

    Original file (PD2009-00514.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately one month after the CI separated from service he had surgery (20050518) to correct his ACL tear and lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. No evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. After careful consideration of all available records the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s right knee condition is most appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for 5259 Right Knee Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tear, s/p Repair of Medial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00014

    Original file (PD2010-00014.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated the left knee ACL deficiency condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of SECNAVINST 1850.4E, DoDI 1332.39 and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), respectively. Left Knee Condition . Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00217

    Original file (PD2009-00217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unfitting ConditionsCodeRatingDateConditionCodeRatingExamEffective Degenerative Arthritis, Right Knee w/X-Ray Evidence500310%20011206Post-Operative Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Knee, w/some Narrowing of the Lateral CompartmentDegenerative Arthritis, Left Knee50030%20011206Degenerative Joint Disease, Left Knee5010 (List All PEB Conditions) The VA C&P exam does not mention any complaint of locking. After this evaluation, the VA increased the ratings for each knee to 20%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01965

    Original file (PD-2013-01965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting s/p left ACL reconstruction condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Members deliberated if this negatively impacted their ability to render a fair assessment and agreed that the available evidence was sufficiently probative; evidence presumed not accomplished would not materially affect the Board’s final recommendation.The PEB coded the left knee Grade II chondromalacia patellae s/pleft...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00033

    Original file (PD2011-00033.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated the right knee ACL instability existed prior to service (EPTS) and right knee medial meniscus tear and lateral meniscus tear conditions as unfitting, combined under a single code and rated 20% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy, Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and Veteran’s Administration Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD). ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Knee ACL...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00930

    Original file (PD-2014-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain, Patellofemoral Syndrome, s/p Arthroscopy x25099-500310%Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee5260-500310%20110803 Internal Derangement, Left Knee5003-525730%20110803Other x0Other x1 RATING: 10%RATING: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20120720(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left Knee Pain . After review by a Decision Review Officer, the VA applied two different VASRD codes to the left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00583

    Original file (PD2009-00583.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB found in view of the “osteoarthritis degeneration of the left knee joint” as interfering with duty and forwarded “Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Left Knee, Failed ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) Reconstruction in the Left Knee and Accompanying Anterolateral Rotatory Instability” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on the NAVMED 6100/1. Based on the examination results, the examiner opined that the CI had Bicompartmental osteoarthritis of the left knee secondary to the ACL...