Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00217
Original file (PD2009-00217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: USCG

CASE NUMBER: PD0900217 BOARD DATE: 20100303

SEPARATION DATE: 20020219

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an Electrician Mate First Class medically separated from the Coast Guard in 2002 after 9 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was Degenerative Arthritis in Right and Left Knees. A Disposition Medical Board determined these conditions prevent consistent performance of his duties.

The CI’s right knee problem dates back to 19820226, when he was kicked on the knee by another child. He was diagnosed with contusion of right knee. He did well until 19851202 when he developed pain in right knee, following basketball and track. In 1986 he was later diagnosed with medial and lateral meniscus tears of right knee. He then underwent arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy of the right knee. After surgery he underwent physical rehabilitation and apparently became fully functional and pain-free after a few months. In 1991 the CI reported right knee pain to civilian physician in Roanoke, VA and was diagnosed with tendonitis of the right knee. He was instructed to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication and wear a Neoprene sleeve on right knee when doing sports. He underwent another arthroscopic partial lateral meniscectomy due to a right lateral meniscus tear on 19910517.

The CI entered active duty in 1992. In 19930709 he was evaluated by CG Support Center Portsmouth with a complaint of right knee pain and was diagnosed with a probable ACL strain and was treated with Motrin 800 mg by mouth three times a day, elastic bandage, and limited duty for 7 days. In 1996 an orthopedic surgeon diagnosed degenerative arthritis of right knee. Initial prognosis was fair, pending rehabilitation. After initial improvement, CI started to complain again about right knee pain, having trouble squatting, kneeling, prolonged standing, walking, and any attempt at running. He had a repeat arthroscopy of the right knee in January 2001 with a partial lateral meniscectomy.

The CI reported left knee pain and restriction of motion in August 1996 after playing basketball. He was diagnosed with minor left collateral tear or strain and rule-out meniscus tear. He was placed on limited duty and referred to physical therapy (PT) and an orthopedic surgeon. The surgeon diagnosed CI with degenerative arthritis of right knee. Due to renewed complaints of left knee pain, an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the left knee was performed 20010713 and it revealed a complex tear of posterior horn body and anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, partial tear of anterior cruciate ligament, possible subchondral cyst versus intraosseous ganglion within the anterior proximal tibia, and thinning of the articular cartilage involving the lateral patellar facet.

The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Coast Guard and Department of Defense regulations.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: “The findings by the USCG (10% for my knees and back) are drastically different from the findings by the Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) (100%) (50% for sleep apnea, 40% for my knees and back, 10% unemployability) for the same diagnosed injuries. At the time of my discharge only the one entity could be utilized and VAMC offered a higher rate.”

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB VA (5 Mo. after Separation)
Unfitting Conditions Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
Degenerative Arthritis, Right Knee w/X-Ray Evidence 5003 10% 20011206 Post-Operative Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Knee, w/some Narrowing of the Lateral Compartment

5259 -

5010

10%

then

20%

20020715

20040409

20020220

20030828

Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee 5003 0% 20011206 Degenerative Joint Disease, Left Knee 5010

10%

then

20%

20020715

20040409

20020220

20030828

Additional Conditions

(List All PEB Conditions)

PEB

DES

(If Yes, List Where: NARSM, H&P, Etc)

Condition

(List All VA Compensable Conditions)

Code Rating Exam Effective
No PEB Entry No Sleep Apnea 6847 50% 20011028 20020220
No PEB Entry No Minor Degenerative Changes, Lumbar Spine, w/some Narrowing of the L4-5 Disk Space

5010 -

5292

10%

40%

20020715

20040218

20020220

20030828

No PEB Entry No Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Left Hand 8599-8515 10% 20020715 20020220
No PEB Entry No Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Right Hand, w/Moderate Degenerative Changes

5010 -

8515

10% 20020715 20020220
No PEB Entry No Depression 9434 NSC
TOTAL Combined: 10%

TOTAL Combined (incl non-PEB Dxs): 70% from 20020220 90% from 20030828

Individual Unemployability Granted from 20020220

________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

The Narrative Summary (NARSUM) documents both knees have slightly decreased flexion that does not meet the minimum compensable rating criteria for rating decreased range of motion (ROM) under VASRD 5260. The service examination does not document the presence or absence of painful motion but the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed five months after separation did document painful motion in both knees. The service exam also documented a trace effusion in the right knee and a positive McMurray’s test in the left knee. Neither exam documented any knee instability or abnormal neurologic exam. Both knees had degenerative changes on X-rays and this was mild on the left and advanced on the right. Radiographs of the right knee show advanced degenerative arthritis involving the lateral joint line. Radiographs of the left knee show early degenerative arthritis of the medial joint line. An MRI of the left knee shows complex tear of the posterior horn body and anterior horn of the lateral meniscus and partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.

IAW VASRD §4.59 Painful motion each knee is rated as 5003 for ROM limited by pain that does not meet the minimum compensable ROM limitation in VASRD 5260. The right knee could also be rated with VASRD 5259 because of the previous repair of a meniscal tear with residual symptoms. Both codes result in the same rating of 10% and neither offers any advantage. The VA rated both knees using VASRD 5010 which is rated in the same manner as 5003 and applied the same rating percentage of 10% to each knee. These codes provide no advantage or disadvantage to the CI.

VASRD 5258 would provide a higher rating percentage if all criteria were met: Cartilage, semilunar, dislocated, with frequent episodes of “locking” pain, and effusion into the joint. The NARSUM states “no real catching or locking” of left knee. The VA C&P exam does not mention any complaint of locking. However, the initial VA rating determination states the service treatment record (STR) shows treatment for locking several times in service, beginning in July 1993. Only one instance of a complaint of locking in the left knee was present in the STR and this is from 1997. There were multiple entries with complaints of locking of the right knee prior to surgery in January 2001. Also, no complaints of swelling of the left knee were found in the STR. It appears more likely than not that the CI did not have frequent locking or swelling of the left knee and therefore VASRD 5258 cannot be applied.

At a later VA examination from 20040409 CI complained of locking in both knees as well as popping, cracking, and stabbing pain. He requested a walker due to degenerative joint disease and frequent falling. He had constant stiffness and throbbing. He arrived at exam in a wheelchair scooter and used a cane for pain and stability when walking. This cane had been prescribed by the VA kinesiotherapy clinic on 20020617. The right knee showed no heat, erythema, swelling or effusion and flexion limited to 90 degrees by pain. Left knee flexion was limited to 110 degrees by pain. This appears to be a worsening of the CI’s condition more than one year after separation. CI separated in 20020219 and had filed a claim for increased disability on 20030828, eighteen months after separation. After this evaluation, the VA increased the ratings for each knee to 20%.

Knee

Movement

Normal ROM

ROM Mil

NARSUM 20011002

VA C&P 20020715
Right Flex 0 - 140 120 0 -140 w/pain
Right Ext 0 - 0 0 0 – full extension w/pain
Notes:

- Normal gait

- Gross crepitus at patellofemoral joint line

- Tenderness to palpation about lateral joint line

- Negative McMurray’s

- Stable to varus and valgus stress

- Negative Lachman, negative pivot shift, negative anterior and posterior drawer

- Trace effusion

-Neurovascular intact in bilateral lower extremities w/5/5 strength. CI sensation is intact to light touch throughout bilateral lower extremities, and has bounding pulses at dorsalis pedis and posterior tib

- Radiographs show advance degenerative arthritis involving lateral joint line

- No edema, positive crepitation bilaterally

- Stability (no motion) : Medial, Lateral, ACL, PCL; Medial Meniscus (McMurray’s) negative; Lateral Meniscus negative

- Increase pain and weakness w/walking greater than 50 feet

Left Flex 0 - 140 0-135 0 -140 w/pain
Left Ext 0 - 0 0 0 – full extension w/pain
Notes:

- Normal gait

- Some crepitus at the patellofemoral joint

- Positive McMurray’s w/some pain along the medial joint line

-MRI showed lateral meniscus tear

-tender to palpation along medial joint line

- Stable w/negative Lachman, negative pivot shift, negative anterior and posterior drawer, and stable to varus and valgus stress, no effusion

- Neurovascular intact in bilateral lower extremities w/5/5 strength. CI sensation is intact to light touch throughout bilateral lower extremities, and has bounding pulses at dorsalis pedis and posterior tib

- Stability (no motion) : Medial, Lateral, ACL, PCL; Medial Meniscus (McMurray’s) negative; Lateral Meniscus negative

- Increase pain and weakness w/walking greater than 50 feet

Other Conditions -- None are mentioned in any Disability Evaluation System (DES) documents: Sleep apnea, Minor Degenerative Changes, Lumbar Spine, w/some Narrowing of the L4-5 Disk Space, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Left Hand, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Right Hand, w/Moderate Degenerative Changes, and Depression

______________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously concluded that the CI’s condition is appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for each knee under VASRD 5003 and a bilateral factor of 1.9.

The range of motion of both knees was limited by pain but the limitation did not reach the minimally compensable level of flexion limited to 45 degrees or extension limited to 10 degrees. Neither knee demonstrated joint instability or locking but both had degenerative changes on X-rays. Therefore both knee conditions are rated under 5003 IAW VASRD §4.59 Painful motion which recognizes painful motion with joint pathology as productive of disability.

The other conditions rated by the VA (Sleep Apnea; Minor Degenerative Changes, Lumbar Spine, w/some Narrowing of the L4-5 Disk Space; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Left Hand; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Right Hand, w/Moderate Degenerative Changes; and Depression) were not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System package and are therefore outside the scope of the Board. The CI retains the right to request his service Board of Correction for Military Records (BCMR) to consider adding these conditions as unfitting.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative Arthritis, Right Knee 5003 10%
Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee 5003 10%
COMBINED (Incorporating BLF of 1.9) 20%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090226, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01153

    Original file (PD2010-01153.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I currently have to take pain medication often on a regular basis over the years for pain from my condition. Right Knee Condition . The Board notes that the MEB and initial VA C&P exams bracket the date of separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00389

    Original file (PD2011-00389.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The multiply-operated left knee with anteromedial knee pain, subjective instability and mechanical symptoms condition, analogously coded 5299-5003, per VASRD direction, would warrant a 10% rating as given by the PEB and the VA. With non-compensable ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00023

    Original file (PD2010-00023.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)0-130⁰120⁰ (pain at 105⁰)Extension (0⁰ normal)-2⁰0⁰CommentPatellofemoral crepitusTenderness over knee medial worse than lateral; Positive patellar compression test§4.71a Rating10%10%At the time of the MEB exam on 2 November 2002, seven months prior to separation, the CI had severe left anterior knee pain which limited his activities of daily living. Negative testing included the McMurray test and tests for ligamentous instability; no effusion was noted and gait was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494

    Original file (PD2011-00494.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688

    Original file (PD2012-00688.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00344

    Original file (PD-2014-00344.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20060405 Left Knee Condition . By the time of separation, the CI’s condition had improved such that he had a full ROM, albeit that knee pain persisted in spite of treatment.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00657

    Original file (PD2009-00657.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at a 20% combined disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The Board rates unfitting conditions based on the medical evidence of functional impairment IAW the VASRD. Prior to 2008 the military service PEBs generally did not recognize pain limited range of motion or painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00231

    Original file (PD2012-00231.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral patella femoral syndrome condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Effective January 2005, the VA assigned separate ratings of 10% for each knee based on new examination evidence supporting separate ratings for each knee. The Board noted that PEBs often combine multiple conditions under a single rating when those conditions considered individually are not separately unfitting and...