RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: army
CASE NUMBER: PD0900150 Separation date: 20040124
BOARD DATE: 20090901
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a Staff Sergeant (SSG/E-6) medically separated from the Army National Guard in 2004 after approximately 18 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was "Chronic pain, right shoulder, due to acromioclavicular arthrosis and rotator cuff tendinopathy, rated as light/intermittent." The injury started gradually, beginning in September 2002 during physical training in Afghanistan and the CI was initially diagnosed and treated for rotator cuff syndrome. On 20030620 Orthopedics changed the diagnosis to "right rotator cuff tendinopathy and A-C (acromioclavicular) joint arthrosis." The CI declined offered surgery which was not considered unreasonable. The CI was referred to the PEB, found unfit and separated at 0% disability.
________________________________________________________________
CI CONTENTION: "I was not properly rehabilitated. I was not able to return to my civilian career. Still have pains as a result of the injury."
________________________________________________________________
RATING COMPARISON:
Previous Determinations | |
---|---|
Service | VA Exam was pre-discharge |
PEB Condition | Code |
CHRONIC PAIN, RIGHT SHOULDER, DUE TO ACROMIOCLAVICULAR ARTHROSIS AND ROTATOR CUFF TENDINOPATHY. | 5099 -5003 |
Bilateral Patellofemoral Syndrome (Medical Duty review Board) | |
TOTAL Combined: 0% | TOTAL Combined (incl non-PEB Dxs): 30% from 20030324 (Bilateral factor (BF) of 1.9 Percent) 0% from 19951015; 20% from 19970802; 30% from 20030324 |
Chronic Pain, Right Shoulder due to acromioclavicular arthrosis and rotator cuff tendinopathy. Rated as light/intermittent. The CI's shoulder issue started gradually in Sept 2002, during physical training exercises in Afghanistan and there is an LOD in the records. The CI was seen and treated by a physician downrange with a diagnosis of rotator cuff syndrome. The CI was placed on a temporary profile and completed his deployment. He had physical therapy and on 20030516 Orthopedics diagnosed right shoulder A-C joint arthrosis with follow-up confirming no obvious rotator cuff tear. Intra-articular steroids resulted in only temporary relief. Orthopedics added a diagnosis of right rotator cuff tendinopathy in addition to the A-C joint arthrosis. Per the NARSUM, the CI was given the options of changing jobs or undergoing arthroscopy with subacromial decompression, distal clavicle excision, and rotator cuff evaluation. The soldier opted to avoid this surgery which was deemed not unreasonable. The CI was not able to perform in his regular MOS, and was referred to the Medical Evaluation Board.
Military exam demonstrated tenderness in the right acromial clavicular junction with some pain on full abduction of the right upper extremity (RUE). Range of motion on 20030721 showed right shoulder flexion 160˚ (180 normal), extension 35˚, abduction 170˚ (180), adduction 53˚, internal rotation 55˚ (90), external rotation 90˚ (90); On neurological, no motor or sensory deficit of the extremities. Right shoulder X-rays with outlet views showed mild degenerative joint disease changes in the A-C joint.
VA examination, dated 20040812 demonstrated a history of discomfort in the right shoulder because of repetitive lifting and difficult to raise his shoulder over his head at one point, although, now he indicates this motion has returned. He reports discomfort with extreme motion and on repetitively raising his right hand over his head. Right shoulder is stable and nontender. Normal range of motion, with flexion and abduction from 1˚ to 180˚ (normal = 0 to 180); internal and external rotation to 90˚ (normal = 0 to 90); extension to 50˚. Ranges of motion are the same actively, passively, repetitively and against resistance. Motion is not limited by pain, weakness, fatigue, or lack of endurance on repetition. X-rays of the right shoulder - normal. Addendum note reveals arthritis shown in MRI in 2002. The VA rated the CI from 20030324 at 10%, 5010, for painful or limited motion of a major joint or group of minor joints and on reevaluation kept the 10% level, but changed coding to 5201-5010 as there was minor decreased range of motion at examination of 20040812.
Either the military or VA exams demonstrate painful motion. The military exam and post-discharge exams show ROM less than the VA normal limits for the right shoulder. The PEB specifically referenced the Army pain rule in their disability description. Absent the pain rule, the right shoulder should be rated at 10% IAW §4.59 Painful motion.
Bilateral Patellofemoral (Knee) Syndrome. This was not contended by the CI. The CI had undergone a Medical Duty Review Board for this condition and was found fit for return to duty with permanent profile in 19990624. The NARSUM addressed the condition in the review of systems as "knee pains on and off with swelling at times for 12 years. He had a P2 profile for this since May 2002. This was previously diagnosed as patellofemoral syndrome." Exam demonstrated no joint swelling; no tenderness; no limitations of joint movements. There is no indication in the records that this condition significantly worsened or that it produced duty limiting disability. This condition did not rise to the level of being unfitting at the time of PEB or discharge.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the PDBR to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board unanimously voted that the right shoulder should be rated at 10% IAW §4.59 Painful motion and that no other condition should be added as unfitting. ________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows effective as of the date of the CI’s prior medical separation.
Unfitting Condition | VASRD Code | Rating |
---|---|---|
CHRONIC PAIN, RIGHT SHOULDER, DUE TO ACROMIOCLAVICULAR ARTHROSIS AND ROTATOR CUFF TENDINOPATHY. | 5009-5003 | 10% |
Combined | 10% |
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090211, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00204
The FPEB exam indicated right shoulder pain-limited motion to 90 degrees of flexion and extension (180 degrees normal) without winging of the shoulder blade (indicating good muscle strength). RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00193
Condition 2: Left Shoulder Using an evaluation completed four months after the time of separation from Service, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 5201-5019 Left Shoulder Partial Rotator Cuff Tear and Impingement Syndrome at 10%. The CI received the same rating percentages from the Air Force PEB and the VA for her back and left shoulder conditions.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00253
Pain rating: Bilateral knees - slight/constant. The PEB noted cervical range of motion limited by pain, with localized tenderness. X-rays showed normal spine.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00403
The VA rated his shoulder as a separate condition as described below. Right Shoulder Pain/Impingement: The VA examination on 20081105 documented Pain to palpation of the right shoulder, painful motion of right shoulder, and crepitation in right shoulder.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00266
Flexion (0-180)110⁰165⁰ w/pain at 165⁰Abduction (0-180)110⁰90⁰w/pain at 90⁰Internal Rotation (0⁰-90⁰)50⁰90⁰External Rotation (0⁰-90⁰)30⁰90⁰Comment4/5 strength; pain w/ resistance impingement test + (Neers); Obrien’s +, tight joint capsuleNo stiffness, swelling weakness§4.71a Rating10% painful motion20% lim motion shoulder levelThe MEB exam (27 July 2005) four months pre-separation documented that the CI had undergone a left shoulder Bankert repair arthroscopy on 14 February 2005. The...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00198
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left knee PFPS conditions as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Sep Left Knee ROM Flexion (140 Normal) Extension (0 Normal) §4.71a Rating 10% 10% The CI was first evaluated in March 2000 for a 2-month history of knee pain while running following trauma. 3 PD12-00198 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01628
He was issued a permanent U3 profile andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated the left shoulder and left cubital tunnel conditions as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a combined 20% disability rating. The ROM was noted as painful. The examiner...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00091
(2) Whether the determination by the PEB that the Veteran's left shoulder pain secondary to acromioclavicular arthritis was unfitting, but rating the condition 0% disabling, was in error because (a) a 10% rating was warranted under the applicable diagnostic code regardless of the extent of limitation of motion, and (b) the VA assigned a 20% rating to the left shoulder disability effective December 15, 2006, concurrent with the Veteran’s separation from the service. Left Shoulder Pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00890
Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . Therefore, even though the VA C&P examination was closer in time to the date of separation, the Board determined this exam had less probative value than the physical therapy and MEB examinations. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00262
At the time of the MEB exam, range-of-motion (ROM) was limited and painful. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.