Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00266
Original file (PD2010-00266.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: marine corps

CASE NUMBER: PD1000266 SEPARATION DATE: 20051115

BOARD DATE: 20110819

______________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Cpl/E-4 (3051, Warehouse Clerk) medically separated for left shoulder labral tear and right shoulder impingement syndrome. The CI was playing basketball and ran into a wall injuring both shoulders. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed left shoulder anterior inferior labral tear. The CI underwent a left Bankert repair arthroscopy in February 2005, without relief. The CI was unable to return to full duty, and was referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded unspecified disorders of bursae and tendons in the shoulder region to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on NAVMED 6100/1. The PEB adjudicated left shoulder labral tear and right shoulder impingement syndrome conditions as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively, with likely application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a combined disability rating of 10%.

______________________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: ‘’Full range of motion is not attained causing lots of pain & discomfort. My shoulder throbs & shoots sharp pains to the bone during certain weather (rain, winter, change of seasons).”

______________________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20050822 VA (3 Mo. After Separation) – All Effective Date 20051116
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
L Shoulder Labral Tear * 5299-5003 10% L Shoulder Bankert Repair* 5201-5024 10% 20060223
Impinge Synd R Shoulder* 5299-5003 0% R Shoulder Impinge Synd* 5201-5024 10% 20060223
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Tinea Versicolor 7813-7806 10%** 20071017
0% x 0/Not Service Connected x 0
Combined: 10% Combined: 20% - **Effective 20070531 combined 30%

*Bilateral factor applied

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Shoulder Labral Tear. The CI had two goniometric range of motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation. Both exams are summarized in the chart below.

Goniometric ROM Left Shoulder

MEB ~ 4 Mo. Pre-Sep

(20050727)

VA C&P ~ 4 Mo. Post Sep

(20060223)

Flexion (0-180) 110⁰ 165⁰ w/pain at 165⁰
Abduction (0-180) 110⁰ 90⁰w/pain at 90⁰
Internal Rotation (0⁰-90⁰) 50⁰ 90⁰
External Rotation (0⁰-90⁰) 30⁰ 90⁰
Comment 4/5 strength; pain w/ resistance impingement test + (Neers); Obrien’s +, tight joint capsule No stiffness, swelling weakness
§4.71a Rating 10% painful motion 20% lim motion shoulder level

The MEB exam (27 July 2005) four months pre-separation documented that the CI had undergone a left shoulder Bankert repair arthroscopy on 14 February 2005. The examiner further documented findings of a positive impingement test, pain with resisted movement, positive Neers test (impingement syndrome), a positive Obrien’s test (indicative of a superior labrum from anterior to posterior tear) and a tight joint capsule. A left shoulder MRI found an anterior inferior labral tear, glenoid cartilage injury, a 5-6 mm loose body in the posterior inferior joint space and a small Hill-Sachs lesion (cortical depression in the humerus bone). The examiner opined that the CI “cannot perform annual physical training or heavy work as required by his MOS” and he was not “medically qualified for service in the USMC.” The examiner recommended no lifting greater than ten pounds, no pushups or pull-ups, no marching or formations, no other physical exercise except as directed by physical training, no field duty nor deployments.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (23 February 2006), four months post-separation documented that the CI had chronic left shoulder pain in the region of the AC joint, usually at level 6/10 and aggravated with movements of left shoulder lifting, carrying, pulling, pushing or throwing with left upper extremity, and with repetitive use.

The VA and the MEB chose different coding options for the CI’s left shoulder condition which did not materially impact the disability rating since limitation of motion is used to rate both. The PEB rated the left shoulder as code 5299-5003 [arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis)] at 10% (with pain with resisted movement). The PEB 10% rating was likely with application of §4.59 (painful motion). The VA coded the condition as 5201 (arm, limitation of motion of) and 5024 (tenosynovitis). The 5201 criteria of the left shoulder limited to flexion 165 degrees with pain and abduction of 90 degrees with pain was met by the preponderance of the examination and rated this as 10%; however, under the 5201 coding a 20% rating is appropriate, because of limitation of motion at shoulder level. The Board must decide which examination has higher probative value. The July 2004 and September 2004 examinations are more consistent with the MEB examination and thus the preponderance of the evidence suggests that this examination is more representative of the shoulder condition at the time of separation. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting a change from the PEB’s rating decision for the left shoulder labral tear.

Impingement Syndrome Right Shoulder. The CI had two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation. Both exams are summarized in the chart below.

Goniometric ROM

Right Shoulder

MEB ~ 4 Mo. Pre-Sep

(20050727)

VA C&P ~ 4 Mo. Post Sep

(20060223)

Flexion (0-⁰180⁰) 165⁰ 180⁰ w pain
Abduction (0-⁰-180) 165⁰ 135⁰w pain
Internal Rotation(0⁰-90⁰) 70⁰ 90⁰
External Rotation(0⁰-90⁰) 80⁰ 90⁰
Comment Pain with resistance; pos impingement test (Neers); Obrien’s neg
§4.71a Rating 0% 10% painful motion

The MEB exam four months pre-separation indicated that the CI had decreased ROM in the right shoulder. The examiner documented that the CI had right shoulder impingement syndrome. MRI done on 19 April 2006 documented that there was no evidence of rotator cuff tear or impingement possibly due to decreased swelling later in the course of healing. The examiner further documented findings of a positive Neers test (impingement syndrome), and pain with resisted movement, but not with motion.

At the VA C&P examination four months post-separation the examiner documented that the CI had chronic right shoulder pain in the region of the acromioclavicular joint aggravated with movement of right shoulder, lifting, carrying, pulling, pushing or throwing with right upper extremity and with repetitive use.

The VA and the MEB chose different coding options for the CI’s right shoulder condition which would not impact the level of disability rating because both are rated based upon limitation of motion. The PEB rated the left shoulder as code 5299-5003 [arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis)] at 0% with pain with resisted movement, but not with range of motion measurement. The VA coded the condition as 5201 (arm, limitation of motion of) and 5024 (tenosynovitis) and rated the condition as 10% for painful motion. Again, the Board must decide which examination has higher probative value. The MEB exam is most consistent with the X-ray findings. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting a change from the PEB’s rating decision.

Other Conditions. The tinea versicolor condition was rated 10% by the VA. This condition was not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not covered by the DES. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.

______________________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the left shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 10%, coded 5299-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the right shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 0%, coded 5299-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The Board unanimously agrees that there were no other conditions eligible for Board consideration which could be recommended as additionally unfitting for rating at separation.

_____________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Shoulder Labral Tear 5299-5003 10%
Impingement Syndrome Right Shoulder 5299-5003 0%
COMBINED 10%

______________________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20100211, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW

BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION

ICO XXXX, FORMER USMC, XXX XX XXXX

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 6 Sep 11

I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.

Assistant General Counsel

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00530

    Original file (PD2011-00530.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain following a labral tear, S/P repair as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Flexion (0-180⁰)130⁰180⁰ -10 0 *Abduction (0-180⁰)No Abduction ROM noted180⁰ -10 0 *CommentsPain with overhead use; Left shoulder same ROM (see text)Painful motion; pain and discomfort with subjective weakness over shoulder level (90⁰); see text§4.71a Rating10%10%At the MEB exam, the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00498

    Original file (PD2009-00498.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for the condition, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. Surgery 2: 20040209 revision SLAP repair However, at the time of separation from service in 2005 the condition warrants a 10% rating as was applied by both the Navy and the VA.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02743

    Original file (PD-2013-02743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Shoulder Pain (non-dominant)5099-500310%Residuals S/P Left Shoulder Surgeries5201-502410%20061114Other x 2 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 10%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070404(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). The VA rated the left shoulder pain (residuals, status post left shoulder surgeries X3) at 10% coded 5201-5024 (limitation of shoulder motion - tenosynovitis) citing painful...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00510

    Original file (PD2009-00510.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for the Left Shoulder Pain condition, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The Board also considered the CI’s Left Knee Patellofemoral Syndrome and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no rating is applied. Exhibit C....

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01048

    Original file (PD-2013-01048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Recurrent Left Shoulder Pain Condition. The CI had a left shoulder injury prior to enlisting into the US Navy;however, his symptoms improved and the shoulder returned to normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01313

    Original file (PD-2014-01313.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Status Post Rotator Cuff Repair5201-501910%20070102Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 3 RATING: 0%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01788

    Original file (PD2012 01788.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW VASRD rating guidelines. Strength and sensation was normal.MEB/PT ROM evaluation17 September 2003appears to document reduced left shoulder abduction of possibly 15 degrees but is illegible; the NARSUM noted the PT consultation as abduction 110 degrees.At the C&P exam the CI reported pain, decreased ROM, and difficulty with overhead motion. Service treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00870

    Original file (PD2012-00870.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After completing physical therapy, he was able to attend AIT physical training for the next 5 months, until he injured his hand at which time he was referred to the MEB. after sep §4.71a Rating *Initially rated 0%; administrative correction to 10% application Army USAPDA At time of MEB the occupational therapist opined “pain limits range of motion,” with documented normal extension with a decrease in flexion 160 degrees (normal 180 degrees) and decreased internal and external rotations. In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00574

    Original file (PD2012-00574.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A left upper extremity radial nerve palsy (resolving) condition was identified by the MEB and also forwarded for consideration by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The Board noted the more proximate timing of the VA C&P exam and the disability rating importance of the examiner’s finding of “Range of motion of the left shoulder is limited by pain, fatigue and weakness.” However, the exam did not specify that arm motion was limited by any specific value, or functionally limited to the “at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00097

    Original file (PD2013 00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the MEB exam and FPEB appearance, the CI reported pain in his shoulder and inability to do pull-ups. The only exam documenting motion limited to the shoulder level (~90 degrees for 20% rating) was the separation exam. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not...