RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP)
be changed to allow him to reenlist.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes he should be allowed to reenlist due to his service
record.
The applicant submits no supporting documentation.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 November
2005. He was separated on 31 August 2010. His service was
characterized as honorable and his RE code was listed as 2X. He
was credited with 4 years, 9 months and 10 days of active duty
service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicants commander denied
him reenlistment eligibility per the AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration. The applicant acknowledged
his non-selection and declined to appeal the commanders
decision. His non-selection required the RE code of 2X.
Commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)
considers the members Enlistment Performance Report ratings,
Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the
airmans willingness to comply with Air Force standards and or
the airmans ability or lack of to meet required training and
duty performance.
The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 24 January 2012, for review and comment within
30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received
no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we are not persuaded by the evidence
submitted in his appeal that a change in his RE code is
warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility, and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04867 in Executive Session on 7 June 2012 under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Nov 11.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Jan 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02457
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. However, his duty performance is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X. We find no evidence of error in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01614
His commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force standards and Core Values. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04153
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).