AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible
to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet considered
under the SRP), or to 1R (First-term airman selected under the
SRP) to allow her reenlistment in the Armed Forces.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her RE code is unjust because she was involuntarily separated
under the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback Program in Mar 12 and the
Control Roster that flagged her to be separated would have been
removed in Apr 12.
In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of a
response to her discharge notification and numerous letters of
support requesting she be retained in the Air Force.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman
basic on 13 Apr 10 for a term of four years.
On 7 Jun 11, the applicant’s commander non-selected her for
reenlistment, citing that on 7 Jun 11, she was arrested/found
guilty of theft in Valdosta, GA and recommended her for the DOS
Rollback Program. An Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was
established on the applicant and her name was placed on the
Control Roster. On 22 Nov 11, the applicant submitted an appeal
of her nonselection for reenlistment and, on 10 Jan 12, her
appeal was denied.
On 31 Mar 12, the applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen,
for Completion of Required Service. She received an RE code of
2X and was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 18 days of total
active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant was projected for
separation under the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback Program on
1 Mar 12. However, she was separated because her commander
nonselected her for reenlistment on an AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration.
In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF,
commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection
authority. The SRP considers the members enlisted performance
report (EPR) ratings, UIF from a substantiated source, the
airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards, and the
airman’s ability, or lack of, to meet required training and duty
performance levels.
While the applicant states her control roster would have expired
in Apr 12 and it was not fair to give her a RE code of 2X, the 2X
RE code is due to her nonselection for reenlistment. She does
not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to
her RE code.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 8 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
2
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00165 in Executive Session on 3 May 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 27 Feb 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Mar 12.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05025
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was discharged from the Air Force, the control roster action had already expired. On the same date, the applicants commander non- selected her for reenlistment. On 4 Apr 14, AFPC/DPSOA informed the applicant that after a thorough review of her personnel records, they discovered that her RE Code of 4I was incorrect and should be 2X (First-term, second- term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) based on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02296
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in regards to his non-selection for reenlistment. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...