Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
Original file (BC-2013-00657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00657
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	XXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED:  NO

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or 
career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under 
the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, 
which denotes “Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR,” to allow her 
reentry into the Air Force.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While she was on active duty she made changes within herself and 
should have been given another chance.  An Air Force recruiter 
submitted a waiver package so she could reenlist, however, it 
was denied.

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her 
DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty; AF Form 931, Performance Feedback Worksheet (AB thru 
TSgt); AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) 
Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force 
Reserve, and various other documents associated with her 
request.

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 6 Sep 2011, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.

On 15 Jan 2012, the applicant was notified by her commander that 
he was not recommending her for reenlistment in the Air Force.  
His reason for this action was the applicant’s conduct did not 
meet the standards required of an airman in the United States 
Air Force.

On 15 May 2012, the applicant acknowledged receipt of her non-
selection for reenlistment and indicated that she did intend to 
appeal this decision.

On 28 Sep 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged with a RE 
Code of 2X.  Her narrative reason for separation was “Completion 
of Required Active Service.”

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  DPSOR states that the applicant 
did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that 
occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on the 
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the 
discharge to include her discharge characterization was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority.  The applicant was separated under the 
Fiscal Year 2012 Enlisted DOS Rollback Program.  This program 
utilized either the separation code JBK (less than six years of 
active service) or LBK (more than six years of active service) 
with a corresponding narrative reason for separation of 
“Completion of Required Active Service.”  The applicant’s 
discharge was correctly administered on the basis of her RE code 
of 2X, which denotes “Denied Reenlistment.”

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends.  DPSOA states that in accordance with AFI 
36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective 
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.  The 
Selective Reenlistment Program considers the member’s Enlisted 
Performance Report ratings, unfavorable information from any 
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with 
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to 
meet required training and duty performance levels.  She did not 
provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant 
a change of her RE code.

The complete DPSOA evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 3 May 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit E).

________________________________________________________________

?
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 7 Nov 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, 29 Jan 2013, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 25 Mar 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 23 Apr 2013.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 2013.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair 

2


2





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05829

    Original file (BC 2013 05829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05829 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to allow him reentry into the Air Force. On 29 September 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220

    Original file (BC 2013 01220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03965

    Original file (BC-2012-03965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03965

    Original file (BC 2012 03965.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03717

    Original file (BC 2013 03717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His separation code of “LBK” (Expiration of Term of Service) be changed due to inconsistencies in his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 Jan 04. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his separation code,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165

    Original file (BC-2012-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589

    Original file (BC 2014 03589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code “JBK” which denotes “Completion of Required Active Service” be changed. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553

    Original file (BC-2008-00553.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00157

    Original file (BC 2014 00157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00157 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "First Term, Second Term, or Career Airman nonselected for reenlistment” be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). According to AF Form 418, dated 8 May 2013, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503

    Original file (BC 2014 02503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of “2X” (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...