DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn
Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be
changed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was put on the list to be discharged on the DOS Rollback
Program. His options were to accept an honorable discharge and
retain all benefits or appeal at the risk of being
administratively discharged.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant’s complete submission with attachment is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who
served from 12 August 2008 through 31 May 2011. He was trained
and served as an Aircraft Hydraulics System Journeyman and was
progressively promoted to the rank of Airman First Class (A1C),
(E-3), with a Date of Rank and Effective Date of Pay Grade of
26 September 2008.
On 11 February 2011, the applicant’s supervisor non-recommended
him for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program
(SRP) based on a pattern of behavior inconsistent with Air Force
Standards and the commander nod-selected him for reenlistment.
The applicant did not appeal the action.
The applicant was discharged with an honorable character of
service, was issued an RE code of “2X - 1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or
Career Amn Not Selected Under SRP,” and credited with serving 2
years, 9 months and 19 days of active duty service.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE
code 2X is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF.
The AFI states, commanders have selective reenlistment selection
or non-selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program
considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings,
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the
airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or
the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and
duty performance levels. The applicant’s supervisor non-
recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected
him on an AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration, on 11 February 2011. The applicant acknowledged
his non-selection and rendered his intent not to appeal on
11 February 2011. The applicant’s non-selection was a result of
his own actions as annotated on his IMT 418. Members do not
have the choice to accept or decline being separated under the
DOS Rollback guidance.
The applicant did not provide any evidence of error or injustice
that would warrant change of his RE code.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 2 December 2011 for review and comment within
30 days. To date, this office has not received a response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
2
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2012-00193 in Executive Session on 24 July 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 5 January 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 7 March 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 March 2012.
Panel Chair
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04621
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant's supervisor non-recommended her on an AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration on 22 Feb 2011 listing numerous disciplinary infractions and her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02577
DPSOS states the DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less than 6 years of active service) or LBK (more than 6 years of active service) with a corresponding narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service since the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ETS may be involuntarily accelerated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00348
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to enlist in any branch of the Armed Forces. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...