RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03414
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The RE code of 2X was given based on the down-sizing of active
duty personnel due to Force Shaping policies. He would like
the code removed so that he can join the ANG or another branch
of service.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicants military records, are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did
not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would
warrant a change of his RE code.
The applicant was separated on 31 Mar 2011 under the AF Force
Shaping Program after serving 9 years, 1 month, and 25 days of
service with an honorable character of service. According to
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, he was authorized separation pay. He received RE code 2X
A thorough search of applicant's record did not reveal an AF
Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration
indicating his non-selection for reenlistment; however, a
printout from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) dated
13 Oct 2011, did reflect the RE code 2X and that his last
evaluation report was a referral.
Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, DPSOA confirmed
the applicant was on the Force Shaping Roll Back list. All
members indentified on the Roll Back were considered for non-
selection of reenlistment by their commanders. The applicant
was on the list of Roll Back members that had been non-selected
for reenlistment; which required update of the RE code 2X. The
RE code 2X is updated once the AF Form 418 has been completed.
DPSOA believes the applicant's 418 was lost somewhere in the
Roll Back process. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF,
states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)
considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings,
Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the
airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or
the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required training and
duty performance levels.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 10 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. At the time
members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an
RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the
circumstances of their separation. The applicants RE code of
2X accurately reflects that he was considered but not selected
for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program.
While we note the AF Form 418 was not available for the Boards
review, in our view, the Air Force office of primary
responsibility has adequately addressed the issues presented by
the applicant and we are in agreement with its opinion and
recommendation. Therefore, after thoroughly reviewing the
evidence of record, and given the circumstances surrounding his
separation, we find the RE code was issued in accordance with
the governing directives and that a change of the applicants RE
code is not warranted. In view of the above and in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-03414 in Executive Session on 22 May 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, not dated, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 13 Oct 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03630
He is trying to rejoin the Air Force but is ineligible because of his RE code. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03630 in Executive Session on 23 February 2012 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05829 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to allow him reentry into the Air Force. On 29 September 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...