Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01175
Original file (BC-2010-01175.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-01175 
  INDEX CODE:  107.00 
  COUNSEL: NONE 
 
  HEARING DESIRED:  NO 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His records be corrected to allow him to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his spouse. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He attempted to transfer education benefits (TEBs) to his wife while he was on terminal leave.  Months later he realized he had not received notification that his request was approved.  He believes that a system error occurred during the time he submitted his request to TEB. 
 
In support of the appeal, the applicant provides excerpts from his military personnel records. 
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 12 September 1984 and was progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant.  He retired on 1 October 2009 after serving 25 years and 19 days of active service. 
 
Post-9/11 GI Bill:  Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:  
 
• Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election.  


 
• Has at least ten years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or statute from committing to four additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or  


 
• Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009, through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service.  


 
• For those individuals eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional service is required.  



 
• For those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009, and before 1. July 2010, no additional service is required.  



 
• For those individuals eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009, and before 1 August 2010, one year of additional service after approval of transfer is required.  



 
• For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2010, and before 1 August 2011, two years of additional service after approval of transfer are required.  



 
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011, and before 1 August 2012, 3 years of additional service after approval of transfer is required. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT states that since Title 38 USC, Chapter, section 3319(f)(1), states that “an individual…may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” they can only recommend denial. 
 
DPSIT states that prior to TEB’s activation, program information and guidance was made available through the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), and the services to make sure that every eligible servicemen understood the process for transferring benefits. 
 
DPSIT indicates that in discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many servicemembers thought they were eligible for the transfer as long as they were serving on active duty as of 1 August 2009, and did not realize that participating in the program required they transfer their education benefits while serving on active duty or selective reserve status. 
 
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 May 2010, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation.  A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 August 2009, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future.  Had those members sought clarification from an educational counselor, read the Department of Defense (DoD) or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that point, or take other measures to make timely decisions before their separation or retirement, they could have initiated a timely transfer of benefits.  However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status.  The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. 
 
The complete HQ USAF/A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 August 2010, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed. 
 
3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents.  In addition we find no basis to question the applicant's account in this matter and do not find it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of this important entitlement.  Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated below. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 
 
 a.  On 31 August 2009 he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective 1 September 2009.   
 
   b.  Transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork as indicated in the attached letter from AFPC/DPSIT within 30 days. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-01175 in Executive Session on 5 October 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
Mr. --------------, Panel Chair 
Mr. --------------, Member 
Mr. --------------, Member 
 
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Mar 10, w/atchs. 
 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10. 
 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10. 
 Exhibit E. Letter, USAF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10. 
 Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10. 
 
 
 
 
 ------------------ 
 Panel Chair 
 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00682

    Original file (BC-2010-00682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six (6) years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01151

    Original file (BC-2010-01151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: At the time he began terminal leave, the Air Force had not published policy on TEBs to dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291

    Original file (BC-2010-01291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEB’s requirement to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00609

    Original file (BC-2010-00609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that “an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.” In discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many service members did not realize that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880

    Original file (BC-2010-00880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180

    Original file (BC-2010-01180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01351

    Original file (BC-2010-01351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00415

    Original file (BC-2010-00415.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During the time that he was attending his separation briefings, no information was available on the requirements for transferring benefits to dependents; specifically, the need to complete the transfer while on active duty. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454

    Original file (BC-2010-00454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00385

    Original file (BC-2010-00385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 August 2009, was sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready...