RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01151
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to allow him to transfer his Post-9/11
GI Bill benefits to an eligible dependent.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he started terminal leave on 26 June 2009, there were no
procedures established to transfer Post-9/11 benefits.
Information about transfer of benefits (TEBs) was incomplete when
he left his active duty station, and had he been on duty when the
application process was released, he would have applied for TEBs
before he retired.
In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from active
Duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Regular
Air Force on 19 April 1989, and was progressively promoted to the
grade of lieutenant colonel. He retired in that grade on
1 October 2009, after serving 20 years, 5 months, and 12 days of
active service.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after
1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the
date of election and agrees to serve four additional years
in the Armed Forces from the date of election.
Has at least ten years of service in the Armed Forces
(active duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of
election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or
DoD) or statute from committing to four additional years,
and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed
by such policy or statute, or
Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from
1 August 2009, through 1 August 2013. A service member is
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of
reserve service.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on
1 August 2009, no additional service is required.
For those individuals who have an approved retirement
date after 1 August 2009, and before 1. July 2010, no
additional service is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement after
1 August 2009, and before 1 August 2010, one year of
additional service after approval of transfer is
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or
after 1 August 2010, and before 1 August 2011, two
years of additional service after approval of transfer
are required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after
1 August 2011, and before 1 August 2012, 3 years of additional
service after approval of transfer is required.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states that since Title 38,
USC, Chapter, section 3319(f)(1), states that an individual
may
transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the
Armed Forces when the transfer is executed. they can only
recommend denial.
DPSIT states that prior to TEBs activation, program information
and guidance was made available through the Air Force Personnel
Center (AFPC), the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), and the
services to make sure that every eligible servicemen understood
the process for transferring benefits.
DPSIT indicates that in discussing this issue with education
counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that
many servicemembers thought they were eligible for the transfer
as long as they were serving on active duty as of 1 August 2009,
and did not realize that participating in the program required
they transfer the benefits while serving on active duty or
selective reserve status.
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
At the time he began terminal leave, the Air Force had not
published policy on TEBs to dependents. However, information
available prior to the July policy release indicated he would be
eligible for the new benefits as long as he was still on active
duty on 1 August 2009. There was no indication that TEB to
dependents would be restricted to those who filled out the
application while still on active duty. The information
available prior to the July policy release indicated he would be
eligible for the TEBs as long he was still on active duty on
1 August 2009. Had he been notified of the new policy, he would
have completed the required documents to TEB to his dependents.
The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation. A1PA states that
members may have had the impression that being on active duty or
in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the
law, 1 August 2009, was sufficient to vest them with the right
to transfer benefits at some time in the future. Had those
members sought clarification from an educational counselor, read
the Department of Defense (DoD) or Air Force guidance that was
very clear on that point, or taken other measures to make timely
decisions before their separation or retirement, they could have
initiated a timely transfer of benefits. However, the Board
could find that there was an injustice if the members were on
active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about
the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces,
and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance
because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could
be effective as early as 1 August 2009, and there would be no
need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system
allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel.
The complete HQ USAF/A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 2 August 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note
the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was
not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps necessary
to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition we find
no basis to question the applicant's account in this matter and
do not find it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected
not to pursue use of this important entitlement. Therefore, we
elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the
applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 31 August 2009 he elected to transfer his Post-9/11
GI Bill Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective
1 September 2009.
b. Transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is
contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork as
indicated in the attached letter from AFPC/DPSIT within 30 days.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-01151 in Executive Session on 5 October 2010, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 31 May 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, USAF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00682
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six (6) years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01175
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00609
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. In discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many service members did not realize that...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00415
During the time that he was attending his separation briefings, no information was available on the requirements for transferring benefits to dependents; specifically, the need to complete the transfer while on active duty. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180
A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01351
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00385
A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 August 2009, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready...