RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01291
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his
dependents.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about
enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his
education benefits to his dependents. He discovered after
retirement, that although he enrolled in the program while on
active duty, he did not elect to transfer benefits. In good
faith, he acted on this information while on active duty.
He believes because he enrolled in the program utilizing the
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) website rather than the
Department of Defense (DoD) website, he missed the opportunity
to request the transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his
dependents.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of
information surrounding his retirement, including retirement
orders, pre-separation checklists; copies of DVA enrollment and
eligibility forms, and other supporting documents.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty on 26 Oct 84. He was relieved
from active duty under the provisions of AFI 36-3203, on
30 Sep 09, with a reason for separation of voluntary retirement:
sufficient service for retirement. He retired on 1 Oct 09 after
serving over 24 years on active duty.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1,
2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the
date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the
Armed Forces from the date of election.
Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces
(active duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of election,
is precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or
statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to
serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or
statute, or
Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from
August 1, 2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member is
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed
20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve
service.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on August 1,
2009, no additional service is required.
For those individuals who have an approved retirement date
after August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no additional
service is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement after August
1, 2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of additional service
after approval of transfer is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after
August 1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, 2 years of additional
service after approval of transfer are required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or after
August 1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012, 3 years of additional
service after approval of transfer required.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIDR states every effort was
made by the DoD, the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), and the
services to make sure that every eligible service member
understood the process for transferring benefits. The transfer
of education benefits system began accepting applications as of
27 June 2009 with an effective date no earlier than 1 August
2009. Many service members understood that the law only
required that one be on active duty or in the selective Reserve
as of 1 August 2009.
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs
requirement to transfer benefits while on active duty. However,
he believed the TEB was a part of the enrollment in the Post
9/11 GI Bill website on both the DoD website as well as the DVA
website. While still on active duty he enrolled in the program
and believed this process also initiated the process to transfer
education benefits to his dependents.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation. A1PA states that
members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in
the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law,
1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer
benefits at some time in the future. Had those members sought
clarification from an educational counselor, read the DoD or Air
Force guidance that was very clear on that point, or take other
measures to make timely decisions before their separation or
retirement, they could have initiated a timely transfer of
benefits. However, the Board could find that there was an
injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not
personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while
serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD
and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The
transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there
would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB
system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel.
The HQ USAF/A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 2 Aug 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit G).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note
the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he
was not timely made aware of all of the steps necessary to
transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition, we find
no basis to question the applicant's account in this matter and
do not find it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected
not to pursue use of this important entitlement. Therefore, we
elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the
applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 30 September 2009, he elected to transfer his Post
9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents, effective
1 October 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is
contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork, as
indicated in the attached AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum, within 30 days.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01291 in Executive Session on 5 October 2010,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Jun 10.
Exhibit F. Letter, AF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2010-01291
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 30 September 2009, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational
Benefits to his dependents, effective 1 October 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is contingent upon the
completion of the necessary paperwork, as indicated in the attached AFPC/DPSIT
Memorandum, within 30 days.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Letter , AFPC/DPSIT
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01151
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: At the time he began terminal leave, the Air Force had not published policy on TEBs to dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00682
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six (6) years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00609
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating that Title 38, United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, section 3319 (f)(1) states that an individual...may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed. In discussing this issue with education counselors and education service officers, they conveyed that many service members did not realize that...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01175
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01351
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00415
During the time that he was attending his separation briefings, no information was available on the requirements for transferring benefits to dependents; specifically, the need to complete the transfer while on active duty. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force...