RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01351
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to participate in the Transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill
Benefits to Dependents program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes it is unjust for the Air Force to deny education
benefits to his dependents because he failed to transfer this
entitlement while on active duty. He would like to take
advantage of this benefit authorized by the United States
Congress.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was commissioned into the Regular Air Force on
October 15, 1988 and was progressively promoted to the grade of
lieutenant colonel, having assumed that grade effective and with
a date of rank of November 1, 2004. He retired on October 1,
2010 after serving 21 years, 5 months and 27 days on active duty.
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty
or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1,
2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and:
Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the
date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in
the Armed Forces from the date of election.
Has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active
duty and/or selected reserve) on the date of election, is
precluded by either standard policy (service or DoD) or
statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to
serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy
or statute, or
Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from
August 1, 2009, through August 1, 2013. A service member is
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has
completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of
reserve service.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on
August 1, 2009, no additional service is required.
For those individuals who have an approved retirement
date after August 1, 2009, and before July 1, 2010, no
additional service is required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement after
August 1, 2009, and before August 1, 2010, 1 year of
additional service after approval of transfer is
required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or
after August 1, 2010, and before August 1, 2011,
2 years of additional service after approval of
transfer are required.
For those individuals eligible for retirement on or
after August 1, 2011, and before August 1, 2012,
3 years of additional service after approval of
transfer required.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states any member of the
Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or
enlisted, on or after August 1, 2009 who is eligible for the
Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the
Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four
additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election
can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their
dependents. The Department of Defense (DoD) via DTM 09-003
allowed a service member that had an approved retirement date
after August 1, 2009 and before July 1, 2010 to participate in
the transfer of benefits without incurring additional service
obligation. Thirty-eight United States Code (USC) Chapter 33,
Section 3319(f)(1), Directive Type Memo (DTM) 09-003 3.g.(1) and
Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2306, required that the transfer
of benefits be accomplished while serving as a member of the
Armed Forces.
DPSIT states the transfer of Education Benefits system began
accepting applications as of June 27, 2009 with an effective date
no earlier than August 1, 2009.
DPSIT notes many service members thought they were eligible for
the transfer as long as they were serving on active duty and did
not realize that participating in the program required they do
the transfer of education benefits (TEB) while serving on active
duty or selective reserve status.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states there has been both an injustice and a
government error regarding his inability to transfer Post-9/11 GI
Bill Education benefits for his family. His understanding prior
to his retirement was a service member had to be on active duty
on August 1, 2009, meet longevity requirements with an approved
retirement date.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PA does not provide a recommendation. A1PA states that
members may have had the impression that being on active duty or
in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the
law, August 1, 2009, was sufficient to vest them with the right
to transfer benefits at some time in the future. Had those
members sought clarification from an educational counselor, read
the DoD or Air Force guidance that was very clear on that point,
or taken other measures to make timely decisions before their
separation or retirement, they could have initiated a timely
transfer of benefits. However, the Board could find that there
was an injustice if the members were on active duty on August 1,
2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a
transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have
ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their
terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as
early as August 1, 2009 and there would be no need to place the
member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction
of the record by Air Force personnel.
The complete HQ USAF/A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on August 2, 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. While we
note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was
not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps necessary
to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In addition, we find
no basis to question the applicants account in this matter and
do not find it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected
not to pursue use of this important entitlement. Therefore, we
elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the
applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated
below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On August 31, 2009 he elected to transfer her Post 9/11 GI
Bill Educational Benefits to a dependent, effective September 1,
2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is
contingent upon the completion of the necessary paperwork as
indicated in the attached letter from AFPC/DPSIT within 30 days.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010-
01351 in Executive Session on October 5, 2010, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the record. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Apr 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIT, dated 7 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jun 10.
Exhibit F. Letter, USAF/A1PA, dated 30 Jul 10.
Exhibit G. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Aug 10.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2010-01351
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On August 31, 2009, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational
Benefits to a dependent, effective September 1, 2009.
b. Transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits is contingent upon the
completion of the necessary paperwork as indicated in the attached AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum
within 30 days.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT Memorandum
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01234
DPSIT states any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09 who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9-11/GI benefits to their dependents. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01072
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880
However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04574
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00765
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01180
A1PA states that members may have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00682
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least six (6) years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEBs requirement to transfer...