RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01413
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214 be corrected to show a Reenlistment (RE) Code of a 1#
rather than a 2X.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was contacted by an Air Force Recruiter regarding a possible
commission in the Air Force as a physical therapist. She has a
master’s degree in physical therapy. She decided to apply for the
commission and completed all the required paperwork and a physical.
When the recruiters found out about her previous enlisted tour with
the Air Force, they checked her background and found out she was
discharged with an RE code of 2X, First term, second term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). They were also concerned about
her enlisted performance reports (EPR’s). She was consequently not
selected for an appointment in the Air Force.
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided a personal
statement and a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 15 August 1990. She was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman with a date of
rank (DOR) of 15 December 1992. On 20 December 1993, her supervisor
initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration, and non-recommended her for continued service based on
her EPR’s and several letters of counseling and an inability to comply
with expected standards. A review of her EPR’s reflects that her
promotion recommendation during two performance reporting periods was
2 – “Not recommended for promotion at this time” and a third EPR of 3
– “Consider.” On 22 December 1993, her commander concurred with the
non-recommendation of her supervisor and denied her reenlistment. She
acknowledged her commander’s intent and appealed her non-selection to
a higher commander. After review, the appeal authority denied her
appeal stating there was nothing in the appeal that would warrant
overturning the commander’s decision. She served for four years and
was discharged on 14 August 1994 after completing her first full term
of service. She was honorably discharged with an RE code of 2X.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states commanders have total SRP
selection or non-selection as long as the airman is eligible for
consideration. Commander’s make select or non-select decisions based
on EPR’s, unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the
airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards, and the
airman’s ability, or lack thereof, to meet required training and duty
performance levels. After a review of her personnel record DPPAE
states there was no error or injustice found that would support her
change request. Her commander, as the authority on recommendations
for reenlistment of squadron members, recommended non-reenlistment.
DPPAE’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
24 May 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. The discharge appears to be in compliance with
the governing AFI and we find no evidence to indicate that her
reenlistment (RE) code from the Air Force was inappropriate. We find
no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the
documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's
appeal, we do not believe she has suffered from an injustice.
Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-01413 in Executive Session on 16 August 2007, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 15 May 07, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 May 07.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03731
On 14 April 1999, an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, was initiated not recommending his reenlistment. The DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02067
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 March 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. An RE code 2X (First-term airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) was assigned. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007- 02067 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed. Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the commander’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15, nonjudicial punishment (NJP), and all actions associated with the punishment be removed; she be reinstated to active duty with her original date of rank; and her reentry (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to return to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02492 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 FEB 2009 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility code of 2X [first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)] be...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00568
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00568 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Code of “JBK,” discharged after completion of required service, be changed. Her “2X” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code, “First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03469
Applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) profile follows: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL PROMOTION EVALUATION 29 Mar 99 4 01 Nov 99 4 01 Nov 00 3 AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration), dated 1 Feb 01, reflects the applicant’s supervisor did not recommend her for reenlistment, stating the member has insisted she is not capable of performing the Life Support duties that are required of her. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...