RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00369
INDEX CODE: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated into active duty so that he may be able to finish his
military career and retire after 20 years.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He completed almost 16 years of faithful service to the Air Force when
his commander decided to deny his reenlistment at 15 years and 11
months. His plan was to join the Army and finish his military career.
However while his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty, included a reenlistment (RE) code of 2X, (Denied
Reenlistment), his separation orders clearly showed an RE code of 1J
(Voluntary Separation).
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his DD
Form 214 and an AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 9 July 1990 and was discharged
on 8 June 2006 with an honorable character of service after serving a
total of 15 years and 11 months. He received an RE code of 2X –
“First term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected
for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). On
11 August 2004, he was served an Article 15 for dereliction in the
performance of duties; specifically for willfully making an official
statement with intent to deceive. He received reduction in grade to
the grade of staff sergeant with a date of rank (DOR) of 11 August
2004, and 30 days extra duty suspended through 10 February 2005. On
4 May 2005, he was placed on administrative hold pending court martial
action and was subsequently found guilty during a special court
martial at Pope AFB for violation of Article 92, UCMJ, and was
sentenced to 14 days of hard labor without confinement and a
reprimand. His last three enlisted performance reports (EPR’s) were
referral reports that included several mark downs and not recommended
for promotion at this time statements.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states commanders have complete
SRP selection or nonselection responsibility. His EPR’s coupled with
the unfavorable information in his records along with his commander’s
statement present overwhelming evidence the applicant was denied
reenlistment. DPPAE notes the applicant declined to appeal his
nonselection for reenlistment. Further, DPPAE could not find an AF
Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, in his
records. DPPAE queried the applicant about the missing AFFM 418 and
the applicant responded that he does not possess a copy of the AFFM
418.
DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that based on the
documentation on file in his master personnel records, the discharge
was consistent with the procedural requirements of the discharge
regulation. The discharge was within the discretionary power of the
discharge authority. He provided no evidence nor did he identify any
errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge processing and
provided no facts warranting his reinstatement to active duty.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
30 March 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. The discharge appears to be in compliance with
the governing AFI and we find no evidence to indicate that his
separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. We find no evidence
of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation
that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not
believe he has suffered from an injustice. Therefore, based on the
available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably
consider this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00369 in Executive Session on 10 May 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Jan 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 7 Mar 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 Mar 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Mar 07.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561
On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01413
A review of her EPR’s reflects that her promotion recommendation during two performance reporting periods was 2 – “Not recommended for promotion at this time” and a third EPR of 3 – “Consider.” On 22 December 1993, her commander concurred with the non-recommendation of her supervisor and denied her reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02967 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable code. Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in her military personnel record. Therefore, we have no basis on which to make any changes...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00681 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 AUG 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. However, based on the documentation provided by the applicant it appears he has made a successful transition to civilian life. MICHAEL K....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572 INDEX CODE: 100.03 HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may reenlist. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...