RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02405
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that she can join
the Air Force Reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was under serious hardship, stress, and was done a grave
injustice. She desires the opportunity to set the record straight and
pursue her military career in the Air Force.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD)
was 2 Apr 85.
Applicant’s Airman Performance Report (APR) profile follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
1 Apr 86 9
17 Jan 87 9
3 Nov 87 9
5 Jul 88 7 (Referral Report)
On 27 and 28 Jul 88, applicant signed AF Form 418 (Selective
Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration), dated
25 Jul 88, indicating acknowledgment of her nonselection for
reenlistment and that she did not intend to appeal the nonselection.
In an undated statement, applicant requested that she be separated
from the Air Force on 10 Jan 89 according to AFR 39-10, Chapter 3,
Section 15. The reason for her request was that she had four months
left on her enlistment and she did not have any intentions of
reenlisting.
On 4 Jan 89, the Chief, Military Personnel, reviewed the factors
associated with applicant’s request for discharge in accordance with
AFR 39-10, Chapter 3, Section 15, and found her justification
sufficient and in the best interest of the Air Force.
On 10 Jan 89, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR
39-10 (Voluntary-Miscellaneous Reasons) with an honorable
characterization of service in the grade of senior airman with an RE
code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but
not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program
(SRP)). She was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 9 days of active
service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this
application and indicated that a review of applicant’s military
personnel records revealed an AF Form 418 (Selective
Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration), dated
25 Jul 88, denying her reenlistment. On 27 Jul 88, applicant signed
the form and again on 28 Jul 88, indicating her acknowledgment of
nonselection and intent not to appeal the nonselection. Considering
the foregoing, DPPAE recommends denial of applicant’s request for
correction of her RE code.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a copy of her
honorable release certificate from the Army along with a letter from
her lieutenant. She also enclosed a business card from her first
sergeant.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After thoroughly
reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that applicant’s RE
code should be changed. We note that applicant acknowledged that she
would not appeal the denial of reenlistment, and while we certainly do
not condone her conduct for fighting and a driving under the influence
(DUI) charge, which was the basis for the denial of her reenlistment,
it appears that she now wishes to serve in the Air Force Reserve. We
also note that she served in the Army Air National Guard (ANG) and was
honorably discharged in Jan 97. The Army ANG Platoon Leader provided
a statement recommending applicant for enlistment in the active
Reserve, ANG, or Air Force Reserve. In view of the above, and after
noting applicant’s overall service record and in consideration of her
honorable discharge, we believe that she should be given an RE code of
“4D” which will afford her the opportunity to apply for a waiver to
enlist in the Air Force Reserve. Whether or not she is successful
will depend on the needs of the service and our recommendation in no
way guarantees that she will be allowed to enlist.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that her RE code, issued
in conjunction with her honorable discharge on 10 Jan 89, was RE 4D.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 August 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
Ms. Leta L. O’Connor, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 7 Dec 98.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Dec 98.
Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant, dated 14 Jan 99, w/atchs.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 100.03
AFBCMR 98-02405
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that her reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code, issued in conjunction with her honorable
discharge on 10 January 1989, was RE 4D.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 00942 INDEX CODE: 100.06; 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2Y” be changed so that she can reenter the military as an officer. At this time SrA XXXXXXXX is not qualified to assume greater...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01528 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” on the DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty,” be changed to “1J” to allow enlistment into the Hawaii Air National Guard. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02967 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable code. Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in her military personnel record. Therefore, we have no basis on which to make any changes...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for reenlistment and the Unfavorable Information(UIF)/Control Roster actions be rescinded; she be promoted, with all back pay; and she be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM. DPPAE indicated that a review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed she was nonselected for...
By completing all requirements, the RE code should have reflected a code which would allow him to reenlist. A complete copy of the DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 27 Jan 98 for review and response. Therefore, his separation and RE codes accurately reflect the reason for his separation and his status vis-a-vis the alcohol rehabilitation program at the time of his separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844
The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1994-00174-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1994-00174 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge be upgraded, her reason for separation (Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions) and separation code be changed, and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B be changed. ...
A letter was submitted requesting a copy of the IG Investigative report pertaining to the applicant and SMSgt F- ---. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Mar 01 for review and response within 30 days. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of her appeal, we do...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1997-03007
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03007 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 126.03 126.04, 131.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, initiated on 10 Sep 96, and imposed on 19 Sep 96, be set aside and removed from his records. According to counsel, the military has no evidence to support the charges that...