NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06724-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error ox injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06728-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP} for spouse coverage. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06731-09
i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No: 6731-09 15 March 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval récord pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06732-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, you received the following disciplinary actions: on 15 October 1983, you received NIP for UA for three days; and on 21...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06739-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06740-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06742-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06744-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06748-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals such as you who are released from active duty at the expiration of their period of obligated service and are not eligible or recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06750-09
6750-09 8 Dec 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD | re Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr: Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06762-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. The discharge authority directed your commanding officer to discharge you under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06763-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your disciplinary record, unacceptable performance, and diagnosed character disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06765-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06774-09
A three~member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06776-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Finally, Marines with a record of misconduct normally receive discharges under other than honorable conditions, and as such, the Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06784-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19.November 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06787-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06788-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06789-09
6789-09 20 Oct 09 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1430 PERS 812 of 14 September 2009, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06792-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material | error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06794-09
6794-09 21 Jan 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO_ Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). g. The 12 month agreement to extend enlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06799-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 22 October 2009. The Board found it sufficient that you were afforded a chance to respond to the Hotline Completion Report of 2 April 2008 before you were removed from the promotion list. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06805-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the ' proficiency/conduct (“Ppro” /"CON”) marks of “1,5"/"1.5" dated 3 July 2007, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Petitioner exhausted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06807-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 November 2007, you were given diagnoses of depressive disorder not otherwise specified, and personality disorder, not otherwise specified,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06808-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No, 6808-09 24 Aug 09 Dear (ARATE This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06814-09
6814-09 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO, Ref: {a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06825-09
Pursuant.to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of advancement to E-5/DC2 be backdated from the March 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06828-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. , On 1 January 1990 you were referred for an evaluation due to alcohol abuse and assigned to a Level iII rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06830-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX N -5100 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 - JSR Docket No: 6830-03 6 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06831-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, an average of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06835-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06844-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show she is entitled to Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for years 2004 and 2005, and by the removal therefrom of four fitness reports, all information pertaining to command directed mental health evaluations, and findings that she was not aerodynamically adaptable (NAA). The Chief, BUMED recommends that she...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06845-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded, however, that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06848-09
“BR three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. On 28 September 1971 you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of larceny of $80, the property of another Marine. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06855-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 February 2010. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) and the Staff Judge Advocate memorandum with enclosures dated 31] January 1995, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06859-09
DEPARTMENE OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, based on college credits. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06861-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an , official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06862-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. On 12 April 1994 you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to failed physical standards ag evidenced by the diagnosed knee pain which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06871-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06872-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(FTS) vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06873-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter | referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the single rate. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06876-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06878-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06887-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06888-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 6888-09 31 Aug 09 Prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ui, Ref: — (a) Title 10 U.S.c. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsaliman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06892-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2010. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06894-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to estabiish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06895-09
6895-09 12 Nov 09 Dear ae This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to ‘the provisions of 10 Usc 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06899-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06902-09
Pursuant’ to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location’ of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...