DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 6871-09
15 July 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 23 September
2002. You were referred for psychological evaluation because of
your increasing symptoms of anxiety. On 4 October 2002 you were
given a diagnosis of an adjustment disorder with anxiety and
recommended for discharge. On 15 October 2002 you received an
entry level separation due to the adjustment disorder, which was
considered a condition, not a disability, which interfered with
your performance of duty. You were assigned a reentry code of
RE-4, as permitted by regulatory guidance.
The Board was not persuaded that the assignment of a reentry code
of RE-4 was inappropriate in your case or that it would be in the
interest of justice for the Board to assign you a more favorable
reentry code. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board. reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, if is important to keep.in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dil or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07580-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden*is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08448-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3G reentry code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07125-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reentry code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. , consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burdén is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01286-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, ‘and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06982-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03155-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2009. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on medical conditions that existed prior to entry into the service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0668 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00140-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2009. Accordingly, and as RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to a Marine discharged by reason of a personality disorder, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03009-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your character of service or your reenlistment code which were correctly assigned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11001-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11001-08 5 October 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2009. Nevertheless, the Board Fouud that these factors...