NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06907-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06910-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Although you were treated for colitis during your enlistment, the available records fail to demonstrate that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 12 August 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06919-09
The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Petitioner was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class effective 30 April 2009. c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06921-09
6921-09 31 Aug 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a). Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) and Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC). The Board, consisting of Messrs....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06924-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. The Department of Veterans affairs (VA) has rated your condition of “inflammatory bowel disease, probably ulcerative colitis” at various times at 10 and 30%, as the severity of your condition waxes and wanes. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06929-09
Z A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted: in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, the Board noted that, serving as an officer in the Marine Corps, you were not assigned a reenlistment code, and therefore, your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06938-09
A.three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your father's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06939-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 . The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06943-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 3 November 1980.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06945-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06950-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06951-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Full Time Support (FTS), Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06958-09
Your allegations of error and | injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board also considered your letter dated 30 December 2009 with enclosures. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06961-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 June 1983, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct. The Board noted that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since a discharge under other than honorable conditions is often directed when a Sailor is discharged for misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06964-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06972-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in, support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06975-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material Submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06982-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06993-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07006-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the characterization of your discharge, given your record of four NJP’s for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07011-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2099. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) on 25 April 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07014-09
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. He was further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07015-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 3 May 1984 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval - record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07017-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07025-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR} program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07026-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “D"” Selective Reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07027-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ori 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07028-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, » sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. declination of the Enlistment Bonus (EB) be recinded and he be_ allowed to receive an EB for his rating.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07039-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable BEGEURCRy regulations and. As your’ present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07044-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07045-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07047-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application’ on 22 July 2009. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions and a reentry code of RE-4 on 21 July 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07059-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), and a Operational Forces (OPFOR) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07061-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07063-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ‘all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerel 4 W. DEAN PE Executive D Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. iN...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07064-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ansufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is.on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07073-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected te show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07080-09
: h. On 8 April 2009, because the OPINS request was submitted only 13 days prior to his requested reenlistment date, Petitioner's request to reenlist for SRB was disapproved. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner's command submitted a request via OPINS prior to 16 March 2009 seeking authorization for Petitioner to reenlist on 20 April 2009 for an SRB. The Navy Personnel Command approved the request to reenlist for an SRB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07081-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect and as amended, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Fleet Reserve pursuant to the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) effective 1 February 2000, vice being discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay on 25 January 2000. Prior to his transfer to the TDRL he was advised by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07082-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Lce Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced to higher paygrade when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07094-09
A three-member panel of the Board.for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07105-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2009. On 14 May 2003 an administrative discharge board recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to a civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07106-09
7106-09 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy RECORD ICO ma Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL ‘Ref; (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07111-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing her failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year (PY) 2010 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of her category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07112-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07120-09
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found there was no error or injustice in your discharge from the Naval Reserve in 1955 when you entered the Naval Academy. While at the Naval Academy, you were simply not training as a member of the Naval Reserve and not available to be called upon to meet emergencies as a member of the Naval Reserve. In the Board's view, any errors made by prior panels in decisions issued many years ago should not be perpetuated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07126-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. e. In August 1988 Petitioner was administratively processed for separation by reason of pregnancy/childbirth due to her inability to comply with the NFC policy program. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing ~ the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 5 August 1988, to RE-3B.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07133-09
Documentary material “considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5, This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.