DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG ;
Docket No: 6805-09
29 January 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 20 May 09 w/attachment
(2) HOMC MIO dtd 10 Sep 09 w/encl
(3) Subj’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
' proficiency/conduct (“Ppro” /"CON”) marks of “1,5"/"1.5" dated 3
July 2007, a copy of which is at enclosure (2).
2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Countryman and Humphrey and
Mr. Vogt, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 28
January 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
relief should be granted. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which
were availablé under existing law and regulations within the
Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps
Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management
Information Systems Division (MIO) commented to the effect tha
Petitioner's request has merit and warrants relief. That
office specifically recommended replacing the contested marks
with “NA” /"NA" and accomplishing a “delete as erroneous” unit
diary entry.
‘CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
the “PRO"’/"CON” marks of 1.5"/"1.5" dated 3 July 2007 and
replacing them with “NA” /”NA.”
b. That a “delete as erroneous” unit diary entry be
accomplished on the basis of this correction.
c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Param fo. fir Pt
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e} of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06547-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by assigning proficiency/conduct (*PRO”/”CON”) marks for 31 July 2007 and raising or removing the marks for 31 January and 14 July 2008. That office specifically recommended replacing the marks to be removed with “not applicable” (“NA”) and accomplishing a “delete as erroneous” unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02283-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the weight control entry for 24 January 2007 to 00000000; changing the “Proficiency” /"Conduct” marks for 31 July 2007, 31 January 2008 and 31 July 2008; and removing the lined through undated service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)")} entry and the page 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05278-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “Proficiency” /*Conduct” Marks assigned for 31 January and 31 July 2008, “3.2"/"3.2" and “3.7°/"4.3," respectively (copy of pertinent data from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) is in enclosure (2)). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02632-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data to raise the “proficiency/conduct” marks of 1.9/1.5" for 31 July 2009 to at least %4.0/4.0." By the e-mail at enclosure {1), Petitioner amended his application to clarify he would be satisfied with removing the contested marks, if...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05761-09
Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “Proficiency” /"“Conduct” marks assigned for 27 duly 2005, “2.0"/"1.9" (copy of pertinent data from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) is in enclosure (2)). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07701-05
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), as amended by the memorandum for the record at enclosure (3), the HQMC Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants favorable action. Corporal ‘s application concerning his request to correct his assigned duty proficiency and conduct markings of 3.5/3.0 assigned on 20021007, 1.0/1.0 assigned on 20030506, and 4.5/2.9 assigned on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07
He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02415-09
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1i(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entry dated i? ‘CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board substantially concurs with enclosure (2) in finding the existence of an error and injustice warranting partial relief, specifically, removal of the page 11(d) entry dated 8 March 2002, with the rebuttal dated 12 March 2002, as...