DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 |
CRS
Pocket No: 6748-09
3 August 2009
This is in reference Lo your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of titie 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
snsufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 6
November 1996 and entered on extended active duty. You were
advanced to DT3, E-4, on 26 September 2001. You received
nonjudicial punishment on 10 December 2002 for an unspecified
offense, On 5 January 2003 you were honorably released from
active duty and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4. You
completed 6 years and 2 months active service.
Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4
reentry code to individuals such as you who are released from
active duty at the expiration of their period of obligated
service and are not eligible or recommended for reenlistment.
Among the likely reasons you were not recommended for
reenlistment are your grade and the nonjudicial punishment you
received shortly before you were released from active duty. The
Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
reentry code. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upen request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in Mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an efficial naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probabie material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01808-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09177-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations. Since you were not recommended for advancement or retention in your next to last graded evaluation which covers the 21 July 2005 to 15 July 2006 period, you were not eligible for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07633-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 30 September 2009. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4 to indicate that you were not eligible for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2216 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 11 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when a Sailor is discharged and is not recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2591 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on | 18 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00739-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 17 November 2003 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a discharge under other than honorable conditions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00907-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2012. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when a Sailor is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5194 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 September 2005. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ,existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06924-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2540-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your NJP, and the fact that you received a reentry code authorized by regulations.