NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06531-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06535-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06536-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. As a result, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or itjustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06539-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06542-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. However, the record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06543-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 6 September 1991, the Commander, Navai Military Personnel Command directed that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06547-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by assigning proficiency/conduct (*PRO”/”CON”) marks for 31 July 2007 and raising or removing the marks for 31 January and 14 July 2008. That office specifically recommended replacing the marks to be removed with “not applicable” (“NA”) and accomplishing a “delete as erroneous” unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06549-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 6549-09 27 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD a, a a Ct
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06551-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06554-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06561-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06565-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB}. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06568-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/488 of 15 Jul 09 (3) Subject’s naval record 1: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted in paygrade E-4, vice E-3. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06570-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 6570-09 2 June 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Further, reference (b) does not specifically authorize...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06576-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06578-09
States Code section 1552. : A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06582-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 May 1975 you received NUP for a 16 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06591-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06604-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enciosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06612-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06618-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2010. On 21 March 1973 you were notified by the Commandant of the Marine Corps that as your disability was considered permanent and ratable at less than thirty percent, you would be discharged with entitlement to disability severance pay effective 31 March 1973. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06620-09
.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2010. You remained on active duty until 5 April 1990 when you were discharged under honorable conditions at the expiration of your enlistment based on your conduct mark average, 2.0. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06628-09
Petitioner’s suspended reduction in rank to corporal was vacated on 5 November 1975, based on this alleged misconduct. Although the not guilty finding at the SCM does not automatically invalidate the decision to vacate the suspended NUP, the Board believes that under the circumstances of this case the interest of justice would be better served by correcting the record to show that Petitioner was not reduced to corporal on 5 November 1975, but continued.to serve as a sergeant until his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06631-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, vice 5 years. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06635-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. 4salman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06638-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06640-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06641-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 6641-09 © 29 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Bubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD TCO ins Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06645-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06652-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06656-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06658-09
record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06661-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06668-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06669-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted “USN”, vice “USNR FTS”. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06670-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support - thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06673-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. For example, an FYO9 or FY10 0369 career Marine at zone ¢c who executes a reenlistment 31 days from the release of this MARADMIN will no longer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06676-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2010. You reenlisted in the Navy on 20 May 1985, after serving over three years of honorable service. The Board, in its review of your application, determined that, in the absence of your official record, employment of a presumption of regularity pertains to your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06677-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 11 August 1975, In its review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06684-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06687-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 06687-09 27 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Enel: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject 's naval record 1. of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06695-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06696-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 6696-09 14 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1430 Ser 811/585 dtd 28 Aug 09 (3) Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06699-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06700-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show restoration of leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06705-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 6705-09 5 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub3 : ii eeeeiias SREVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD” Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be =: corrected by setting-aside the nonjudicial punishment | {NJP) he received on 5 March 2008...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06714-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. The ADB voted to separate you due to your misconduct with a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06715-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06720-09
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Therefore, you were recommended for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to your misconduct, and you exercised your right to request an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06722-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in e#ecutive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...