DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC
Docket No. 6724-09
9 September 2009
Dea ie
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
8 September 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/524
dtd 27 Jul 09, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
‘furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error ox injustice.
Sincerely,
\y .
W. DEAN PPEI
Executive Di XY
Enclosure
t
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1260
Ser 821/524
27 Jul 09
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-31C
Subj: BCNR PETITION 1co 772i
Ref: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 5 Jun 09
(b) OPNAVINST 1160.8A
(c) NAVADMIN 050/09
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. Per references (a) through (c), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting to receive a SRB award level cf 3.0
vice 0.5 for the STG/0466 NEC,
3. At the time of his reenlistment on 30 Apr 2009 the award level for
STG/0466 NEC was 0.0 as it was eliminated on 11 Mar 2009.
4. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as
is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1} is
‘returned.
Diva ator Director
Enlisted Career Progression
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07251-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per references (a) through {c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06615-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of the petitioner's reenlistment on 21 February 1991, - 0430 or STG reference (b) was in effect.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09783-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02891-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY . BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 2891-09 16 June 2009 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05798-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09699-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references {a} through (c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07133-09
Documentary material “considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when ‘applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 5, This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01598-09
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.