Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06844-09
Original file (06844-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20376-5700

 

JRE
Docket No. 06844-09
27 April 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy -

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: 1) DD Form 149

2) Chief, BUMED ltr 6320 Ser: MO005B/09UM00T240, 20 Jui 09
3) NPC memo 1610 PERS-32, 1 Sep 09,

4} Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with
this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be
corrected to show she is entitled to Incentive Special Pay (ISP)
for years 2004 and 2005, and by the removal therefrom of four
fitness reports, all information pertaining to command directed
mental health evaluations, and findings that she was not
aerodynamically adaptable (NAA).

  

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. S . lll.
"=e reviewed Petitioner's allegations of

 
 

erro
injustice om 22 April 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the partial corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and

regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
ec. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Board was
advised by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED), in
effect, that the information in question pertaining to
Petitioner’s mental health evaluations and the determination
that she was NAA is properly filed in her record. In addition,
Petitioner met the criteria for ISP for 2004 but there is a
question concerning the timeliness of her application for that
pay. It appears that she met the criteria for ISP in 2005 but
her request was never received by BUMED. The Chief, BUMED
recommends that she receive ISP for 2004 if the Board concludes
that there was reasonable cause for the late submission of her
request for ISP, and that she be entitled to ISP for 2005 if the
Board determines that she made a timely request for ISP and that
there was reasonable cause for its loss or failure to be
forwarded to BUMED in a timely manner. If payment of ISP for
2005 is approved, it should be apportioned only for the periods
she had active medical specialty privileges, i.e., 6 October-22
November 2005 and 13 February-5 October 2006.

d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Commander, Navy Personnel Command, expressed the opinion that
three of the four contested fitness reports are valid and
properly filed in Petitioner’s record, and that she has not
demonstrated that there was no rational support for the actions
of any of the reporting seniors or that any of the reporting
seniors acted illegally or improperly. As the fourth report is
.not valid and is not filed in Petitioner’s record, no action by >
the Board is required.

e. The staff of the Board mailed a copy of enclosures (2) and
(3) to Petitioner for her review and possible rebuttal. She did
not submit a rebuttal statement or any additional evidence or
argument.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner has failed to submit sufficient
relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice with regard to the fitness reports
in question that are filed in her record, or the information in
her record pertaining to command directed mental health
evaluations and findings that she was not aerodynamically
adaptable. In this connection, the substantially concurs with
the comments contained in enclosures (2) and (3). Accordingly,
so much of her application as pertains to those issues is
denied.

 

With regard to her request for ISP, the Board concludes that
Petitioner has submitted sufficient evidence to demonstrate her
entitlement to ISP for 2004 and portions of 2005, as specified
in enclosure (2).

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds an injustice that
warrants the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that -
her application for ISP for the periods 6 October 2004-5 October
2005 and 6 October 2005-5 October 2006 were submitted and
approved by proper authority in a timely manner, and that she is
entitled to ISP for the former period, and an apportioned
payment for the latter, with no entitlement for the period 23
November 2005-12 February 2006 when she did not have active
medical specialty privileges.

b. That no further relief be granted.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's

proceedings in the above entitled matte Z

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ES R. EXNICIOS

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of alithority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Wo Meet P a

W, DEAN PFETF

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12129-08

    Original file (12129-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Incentive Special Pay (ISP). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09764-10

    Original file (09764-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Incentive Special Pay (ISP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7179 13

    Original file (NR7179 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) from 1 October 2010 through 30 September 2011 in the amount of 520,000 as a Medical Physician. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 December 2013 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4999-13

    Original file (NR4999-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) from 1 October 2010 through 30 September 2011 in the amount of $20,000 for an Internal Medicine Physician. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08322-01

    Original file (08322-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Bpard requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 1 October 2000 but continued to serve in the She is also requesting credit for paid-drills from February 2001. It CONCLUSION: The fact that the doctor found her physically The Board believes that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9315 13

    Original file (NR9315 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed ‘enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Incentive Special Pay (ISP) and Medical Additional Special Pay (ASP) from ey -: 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08223-02

    Original file (08223-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case (2) Subject's naval record Sumnary From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she ,transferred to the Retired Reserve under the provisions of the Reserve Transition Benefit (RTB) program. Petitioner filed her application within 40 days of that She also points out that if she had applied on 12 NPQ her...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06851-98

    Original file (06851-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) for 1995 and 1996. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6851-98 MMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07170-02

    Original file (07170-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments BUMED memorandum 7220 Ser Subject’s naval record 132/02-9254 of 4 October 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05299-08

    Original file (05299-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to medical Incentive Special Pay (ISP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...