Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09982-02
Original file (09982-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 9982-02
26 August 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130D1/03U0297 of 17 April 2003, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

thatthecircumstances 

o? 

yourcase 

cannotbe~taken.
It isregretted  
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Xi&that-fame-a&M  

are 

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV

Y

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN 

REPLY 

REFER T O

542 0
N13 
17 April 2003

ODl/ 

o3uo297

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subi 

:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE PETTY OFFICER

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#09982-02  with microfiche service record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty

1.
Officer-s petition

.

N130 recommends disapproval of Petty Officer

2.
for an Enlistment Bonus  

(EB).

petition

Petty Office

3.
on 25 August 2000.
Petty 
agreement to extend his enlistment for one year.
favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.

Office- states that he was offered an EB upon

entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP)
He shipped to Active Duty on 24 July 2001.

He requests

Annex

4.
2000 enlisted him with the following options:

‘A" to Petty  

Office-D Form 4 dated 25 August

(1) FOUR YEAR OBLIGATOR SEAMAN SUBFARER APPRENTICESHIP

PROGRAM GUARANTEE  

($YO/SF-SS)
(2) SUBMARINE VOLUNTEER

No modifications to Annex  
does not have an EB contract in his service record and therefore
is not entitled to an EB.

‘A" were found.

Petty Officer 

&Wkik&

In addition, unless documented elsewhere, since no

5.
extensions were observed,
extension from Petty Office-record

recommend removing the 12-month

.

BCNR  case file with microfi

6.
herewith as enclosure (1).

ecord is returned

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02

    Original file (02895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00175-02

    Original file (00175-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20310-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/o2~0580 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00175-02 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Navy Recruiting Command and the 1160.6A "members enrolling in .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02

    Original file (05754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02990-02

    Original file (02990-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 AU8 2002 02UO428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02990-02 with microfiche service record 1. entitled to that payment upon completion of his He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker has a valid EB Contract in the amount of Kicker Program was not in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04554-03

    Original file (04554-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. 8 Aug 2'003 03UO563 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: OMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER 4 -: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04554-03 with microfiche service record The 1. April 2001. favorable action that would allow payment of a $9,000 In her petition, Petty Officer -request She shipped to Recruit Training Command the Navy through the Delayed s EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03932-02

    Original file (03932-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 12 Aug 2002 ODl/ OZUO430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03932-02 with microfiche service reccrd The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. -does not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02

    Original file (00549-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06349-02

    Original file (06349-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. an EB. Petty Officer received an EB contract upon entry into the DEP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02

    Original file (04584-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie.. entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of...