Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02
Original file (10050-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                                                                           LCC:ddj
                                                                                          Docket No: 10050-02
                                                                                          19 February 2003
        

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPPSYSCMD memorandum 4050 Ser 53F/4 of 13 January 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,



W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure






         DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                     NAVALSUPPLYSYSTEMSCOMMAND      
         5450 CARLISLE PIKE     COMMERCIAL
 P0 BOX 2050
 MECHANICSBURG PA 17055-0791



                                                                                  TELEPHONENUMBER
                   COMMERICAL
         AUTOVON
                 
                                                                                          IN REPLY REFER TO:
                                                                                           4050
                                                               Ser 53F/4
                                                                        JAN 13 2003     

From:    Commander, Naval Supply Systems Command
 To:      Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:    ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF

Ref:     (a) BCNR memo PAY: DDJ of 16 December 02
End:     (1) XXXXXXXXXX BCNR file

 1.       In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1). Enclosure (1) is returned.
2.       Our opinion is that XXXXX entitlement to transportation of his household goods at government expense expired on June 1992. In accordance with Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR) paragraph U5365, member failed to comply with, or request a shipping extension as prescribed in the JF’TR.
3.       However, as a Secretary designated representative, and review authority, your response to the member will determine the final correction to the member’s records.
4.       NAVSUP point of contact is



















Visit the NAVSUP Home Page at www.navsup.navy.mil
For One Touch Supply go to www.navsupnavy.mil/onetouch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01309-02

    Original file (01309-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He was advised that based on his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03819-00

    Original file (03819-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD memorandum 4050 SER 2000, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01232-07

    Original file (01232-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUPSYSCMD letter, 4050 Ser 53E/024, 27 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00566-10

    Original file (00566-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have not provided a compelling reason as to why you could not or did not wait for funded orders before moving your property.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1343-13

    Original file (NR1343-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2013. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1344 13

    Original file (NR1344 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6291 13

    Original file (NR6291 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/088 dated aD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8210 13

    Original file (NR8210 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/103 dated ————e a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3859 13

    Original file (NR3859 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March-2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated (RP @ copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04850-08

    Original file (04850-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...