Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09974-02
Original file (09974-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION

2 

NAVY 

OFNAVAL RECORDS

 
ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 9974-02
24 June 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 June 2003.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81  
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

l/276 of 29 May 2003, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL   COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

1160
Ser 
811/276
29 May 2003

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 09 Sep 03

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN  
(c) OPNAVINST  

049/01
1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference 

1.
petitioner's request.

(a), recommend disapproval to the

The petitioner entered the Enlisted 

(ECP) in
The petitioner reenlisted on 23 May 2001 for six years to

Commissior?ing  Program 

2.
August 1998.
continue Navy service.

The petitioner received a letter of disenrollment from the ECP on 31

The petitioner requests to receive the remaining 58 months
(b) at the time the

" SRB entitlement offered in reference

 

3.
July 2002.
of zone "A 
petitioner reenlisted.

Per reference  

(c), member's who reenlisted/executed an extension for

4.
SRB prior to applying for an officer procurement program, who are
dropped from the program and return to enlisted status in the same bonus
(b),
skill, will receive remaining installments.
members who reenlist/extend to obtain sufficient obliserve for an
officer program are not entitled to SRB.

However, per reference  

The petitioner was participating in the officer program at the time

5.
of reenlistment, therefore the member is not eligible for the remaining
zone "A" entitlement.

In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remain as

6.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference  

7.
Board for correction of Naval Records
returned.

(BCNR) only.

 

(a) for the use by the
Enclosure (1) is

--

~

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03901-02

    Original file (03901-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. petitioner did not receive the zone reference (b) because he was selected for the NECP. The petitioner request SRB payment based on SRB eligibility effective the date of reenlistment and after his release from the NECP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05110-03

    Original file (05110-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive-the The petitioner ‘C" SRB reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03

    Original file (05848-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02

    Original file (09430-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10360-02

    Original file (10360-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10796-07

    Original file (10796-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/335 dtd 28 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.