NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10281-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2003. It concluded that although your service was extended until 31 October 2001 to allow you to recuperate from the surgery, there was no need for an extension beyond that date, and no basis for further action by an MEB or the PEB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10286-02
104—450, see 1996 U.S. Code Cong.and Adm. News, p. 238.House Report No. (b)(1) as so designated, substituted “under this section” for “under this chapter”, and added subsecs. Amendment to this section by section 635(b) of Pub.L.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10290-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2003. I1 The Board noted that in order to qualify for disability separation or retirement from the Armed Forces, 5 service member must be unfit to perform the duties of the member's office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disak'ility. Consequently, when applying for a correction of iin official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10295-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 24 November 1979 you were notified of pending administrative separation action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. paygrade E-2, On 30 October However, on 20 board (ADB) recommended...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10299-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 September 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for communicating a threat and were awarded a $135 forfeiture of pay and correctional custody for seven days, which was suspended for six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10311-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10312-02
d. Petitioner was released from active duty and discharged from the Navy on 28 February 2002, and he accepted a commission in the Naval Reserve. That Petitioner's naval record be further corrected to show that on 30 May 2002, while he was entitled to receive basic pay, the Secretary of the Navy found him unfit to perform the duties of grade by reason of physical disability due to migraine headaches, and status/post Lisfranc fracture, left foot, which were incurred while Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10329-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 May and again on 16 July 1959 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a one day period of unauthorized absence (UA), failure to obey a lawful order, absence from your appointed place of duty, resisting arrest, and breach of the peace. The Board, in its review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10332-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (HHGs) at government expense corrected to show entitlement to ship household goods incident to his transfer to the Retired List was extended beyond the one year limitation. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10338-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 20370-51 00 MEH:ddj Docket No: 10338-02 22 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10343-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 October 1966 you were convicted by SPCM of a 67 day period of UA and were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, a $342...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10360-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10366-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10376-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTM rating (NEC 9238). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10384-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the orders assigning Petitioner to Temporary Duty under Instruction (TEMDUINST) to STU AHS FT S HOUSTON, Fort Sam Houston, TX were modified to authorize payment of per diem while in TEMDUINST status at Ft Sam Houston, TX. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10392-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate the material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10396-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a depressive disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10406-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicati.on on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10413-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for your separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10414-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10415-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. separation by reason of unsuitability, stating in part, that further retention in the service would not be in the best interest of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10416-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, and especially the repetitive and lengthy periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10440-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be audited and corrected to show Petitioner received credit for the correct number of years for retirement purpose. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10441-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 14 August 1970 you received an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10443-02
In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HQMC Career Management Team (CMT), the office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner her failures of selection for promotion, has commented to the effect that this request would warrant approval if the entire fitness report in question were to be removed. Chairperson, Performance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10447-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Milner, and Brezna, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10457-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYCHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13OD1/ 03U0112 3...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10462-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating and advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10463-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 January 1973 you were convicted by SPCM of two periods of UA totalling three days, You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, a $300 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). On...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10467-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the reenlistment executed on or about 4 February 2002 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10468-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 30 January 1985 you received an other than honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10471-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a personality disorder. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for your separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10489-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. .25 for the additional 6 months time in rate Your Final Multiple Score (FMS) of 176.36 minus would give you a FMS of 176.11 to be applied to the March 2002 Exam for consideration for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10492-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 10492-02 17 September 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Subj: REVIEW Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL, OF RECORD Ref: Encl: U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his service be changed. He was Although the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10496-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show show that his leave balance as of 1 October 2002 be adjusted to reflect an additional 13 days of accrued leave. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10502-02
If your .ed A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2003. After consulting with legal you elected your right to present your case to an discharge board separation under other than honorable conditions by reas misconduct. the ADB and recommended an other than honorable reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10536-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 17 June 1987. nd Mr. Mr. s o ~~~~~~w~~n~fsE:~~n~~,~ error and injustice on 3 June 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10538-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Kim, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 September 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10564-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recorda, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 6, 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman petition.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10574-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10582-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10589-02
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. (NOTE: Petitioner will go to the closest facility which computes travel vouchers and file a travel voucher for each period of TDY. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10608-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2003. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your theft of pills and other misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10618-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct, as evidenced by the three nonjudicial punishments and It is clear that you did not respond...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10622-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 10622-02 17 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10633-02
Pursuant to the provisic filed enclosure (1) with this corrected to change the terr s of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, !oard requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be of reenlistment. The Board, consisting ( Petitioner’s allegations of el regulations, determined that available evidence of recorc enclosures, naval records, a Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed )r and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its he corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10638-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10639-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction oE Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10641-02
H A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2003. That Board, which met on 12 July 1973, determined that you were not fit for duty, and rezommended that you be discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. You were discharged in accordance with the approved findings and recommendation of the medical board, and your request, on 27 July 1972.