DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS
2 N A V Y A N N E X
WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 9980-02
9 September 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 9 September 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandums 140013 MMPR-2 of 5 August 2003 and
1650 MMMA-3, 25 July 2003, a copy of each is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221345104
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1 4 0 0 1 3
MMPR-2
5 Aug 2 0 0 3
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF
559 80 3591, FORMER USMC
Ref:
(a) BCNR Docket Number 9980-02 of 16 Dec 2002
1. Per the reference, -asserts
promoted to the grade o corporal.
the should have been
2. A review of F
lance corporal permanent), the highest rank he held, on 1
February 1969.
record verifies he was promoted to
s
3.
CO
does not meet the requirements for promotion to
3
3
Malor, U. S. Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Promotion Sect
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07203-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ~r.-e~uests DD 214 to verify his rank of corporal.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05934-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,, Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06097-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03636-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 19 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 1204.3 of reference (b), it states that the assignment to weight control is a promotion restriction, therefore he was not eligible for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04214-99
Documentary material considera application, together with all material submitted in support tl applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 f 28 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 2400.5 of the reference, I n eritorious promotions to PFC and LCpl effected under the provisions of Section 2 of Chapter 4 are not entitled to remedial adjustment of their effective dates...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07507-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Docunwntary ~naterial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all tilaterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1500 CMT 12 Feb 02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS IN THE CASE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00337-02
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 February 2002, and a memorandum for the record (MFR) dated 11 March 2002, copies of which are attached. as listed with a d. Reference (c) states "...officers retired voluntarily shall be retired in th satisfactorily held ..." grade of Major effecti issioned officer grade luntarily retired in the e. Due t retirement on 990501, his selection to lieutenant colonel was nullified. Per references (d) and ( would...