Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02
Original file (10126-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS



  I
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                         FC
                                                         Document No: 10126-
                                                         02
                                                         28 April 2003



        From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
        To: Secretary of the Navy

        Subj:    EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
                 iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~

        Ref:     (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

        End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
                 (2)   Case Summary
                 (3)   Subject’s naval record

        1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
        former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
        requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.

        2.  The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Novello, and Ms.
        Nofziger reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
        on 23 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
        the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
        available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
        the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
        applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

        3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
        to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as
        follows:

             a.   Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
        administrative remedies available under existing law and
        regulations within the Department of the Navy.

             b.   Although Petitioner’s application was not filed in a
        timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
        statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

             c.   Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 19 August
        1991 at the age of 19 in pay grade E-1. He served on active duty
        for a period of ten months and twenty-eight days. During this
        period, Petitioner was not the subject of any disciplinary action.
        He was discharged after being diagnosed with a severe personality
        disorder and an adjustment disorder. The examining psychiatrist
        concluded that his retention would pose a risk for self-harm. On 27
        July 1992, he was issued a general discharge and assigned a
        reenlistment code of RE-4.
     d.     Character of service is often based, in part, on conduct and
overall trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were
3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Averages of 3.0 and
2.8 were required at the time of Petitioner’s service for a fully honorable
characterization of service.

     e.     Because Petitioner was diagnosed with a personality disorder,
applicable regulations authorized the assignment of an RE-3G or RE-4
reenlistment code. The RE-3G code means a servicemember is recommended for
and eligible for reenlistment except for the disqualifying factor of the
personality disorder. An RE-4 means the individual is not recommended for
reenlistment.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board now
finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. The
Board’s findings are based on Petitioner’s final satisfactory overall trait
averages, and particularly the lack of any disciplinary record.
Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form of
recharcterization of his discharge from general to honorable is
appropriate. However, given the severity of his personality disorder and
adjustment disorder, the Board concludes that the RE-4 reenlistment code
should not be changed.

RECOMMENDATION:

     a.     That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 16
July 1992 Petitioner was assigned an honorable discharge instead of the
general discharge actually assigned on that date.

     b.     That no further relief be granted.

     b.     That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to
the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged
from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to
the record in the future.

     c.     That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s naval
record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of
Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval
record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
                                                                    /
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
      W.    IF
                                        Executive Dir~t~\~

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02968-01

    Original file (02968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting changes in the reason for discharge and reenlistment code. The discharge i. Petitioner provides copies of Evaluation Reports from March 1996 through June 1998 which show he was consistently marked as "Meets Standards" (3.0) or The evaluation report submitted upon separation was not provided by Petitioner and presumably was adverse, and no longer recommended him for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07905-07

    Original file (07905-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTiON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJRDocket No: 7905-07 April 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVI NAVAL RECORD OF___ -Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her discharge be upgraded and her reenlistment code changed.2. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04647-07

    Original file (04647-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4647-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORM! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing his reentry code issued on 22 October 2001. With respect to his reentry code the Board notes that the RE-4 reentry code is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 14_44_25 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_42_33 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_46_23 CST 2001

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09774-09

    Original file (09774-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reason for discharge (personality disorder) and RE-3G reenlistment code be changed. The evaluation recommended an expeditious administrative separation due to a personality disorder that existed prior to his enlistment. Ten months later, on 10 May 2006, his commanding officer issued him a counseling/warning concerning his diagnosed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04930-01

    Original file (04930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    4930-01 19 November 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. On 24 November e. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G or RE- 4 reenlistment code to individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09299-06

    Original file (09299-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlistment member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 24 August 2001 but served on active duty and service on active duty until the completion of his enlistment. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3G or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Given the...