NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08358-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08360-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence enclosures, naval records, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08361-01
Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing both the “not observed” and observed enlisted performance evaluation reports for 1 December 1994 to 30 January 1995, the performance evaluation report for 31 January 1995 to 5 March 1996, and the service record page 9 (Enlisted Performance Record) whose last entry is the entry” for 1 December 1994 to 30 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08364-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Mental Health Evaluation, Ship’s Psychologist. Separation Physical: Answered “yes” to having attempted suicide prior to enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08364-02
Documentary material considered by the Board together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 16 January 2003. The Board found that you were released from active duty on 31 May 1956 and transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). You are entitled to .stances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be tve the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and applyi g for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08365-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that ‘he was assigned a reenlistment code other than the RE-4 code he received on 23 July 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08366-02
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modification of your fitness report for 18 April to 1 September 1998 by removing the last two sentences from the reviewing officer ’s comments. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISOR SERGEAN HE CASE OF STAFF USMC despite the difficulties...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08371-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be paygrade E3 based on the completion of the required number of corrected to enlistment in college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 December 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08372-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8372-01 4 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08376-02
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 September 2002 with attachment, a copy of which is attached. They also noted that the Marine Corps Total Force System entry in the report of the 2001; attached to the the contested fitness report for 1 March 2001 to 18 February 2002 stated you were removed on 20 December 2001. PERB report showed you were assigned to weight control on 17 January It is regretted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08377-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend disapproval of the There are no waivers granted for zones. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08377-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board in support thereof, your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were given a diagnosis of chronic right middle ear disease, which existed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08378-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the general discharge, reason for discharge, and the RE-3C reenlistment code issued on 27 October 1987. Petitioner's conduct and A minimum However, '10" given upon the initial Without the mark of zero, h. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of an RE-3C reenlistment code to an individual...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08379-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1 160 Ser 8 1 (3) Subject ’s naval record l/O84 of 9 April 2002 From To: Ref: Encl : Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show he reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. 3 L. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08379-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of enlistment. The Board, consisting of allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08381-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08382-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08384-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 6 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation never officially counseled The petitioner contends he was 2. that his performance was or would result in an adverse fitness report. The Board believes Sub-j: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION 0 LIEUTENANT COLONEL OF SMC b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08387-01
Petitioner denied that the applicant Petitioner was offered, and he accepted, NJP. Analysis a. Petitioner claims that his NJP was unjust because he believes the preliminary inquiry into his misconduct contained "inconsistencies" a statement Petitioner made at the NJP. The record of the NJP reveals that the NJP was just.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08393-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 21 June 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08394-01
Petitioner c>aims his punishment was unjust 4. because he was never ordered not to buy a vehicle; even if he was given such an order, did not buy the car, rather he leased it; and finally, even if he was in the wrong, Petitioner believes his offense did not warrant reduction to LCpl and removal from MSG battalion. 3 Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS IN THE CASE 0 (BCNR) APPLICATION synopsis of the restrictions governing buying or renting vehicles while attached by Company...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08394-98
all its findings at paragraph 3 of its previous report at b, Petitioner ’s fitness reports for 1 May 1987 to 31 JuIi.1988 (extended to 31 October X November 1988 to 14 “Duties Assigned ”), that JuIy 1989 (last two documents at enclosure 1988) and Board ’s previous report) both show, in block 28 ( Assistant Judge Advocate General (Operations and Management) no express statement in either report to the effect that he served as the Principal Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (PDAJAG) 1988...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08395-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WAsHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 6 February 2002 8395-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. committed any acts of misconduct during his enlistment, or performed his duties in an unsatisfactory manner, it would be in the interest of justice to assign him a reenlistment code RE-3E, which would permit him to apply for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08399-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2003. On 10 June 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the characterization of the discharge to general under the provisions of the Special Discharge Review Program (SDRP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08405-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08406-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board believed that Your request You Further, the Board concluded Accordingly, your application considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08408-02
A three-member panel of session, considered your injustice were reviewed in applicable to the proceedin consisted of your appli naval record records were lost. Documentary material considered by the Board together with all material submitted in support thereof, your s, regulations and policies. applyi g for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the : W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08411-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the National Naval Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, a copy of which is attached. I support for the personality disorder diagnosis, because there was no documentation of longstanding emotional problems. There is limited support for the diagnosis of a personality disorder in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08413-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum of 15 January 2002 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject 1. to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08419-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlistment member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08424-01
10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08436-01
Without action by this Board, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) removed the fitness report, but their action was not effected until after Petitioner ’s FY 02 failure. CONCLUSION: all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting removal of Upon review and consideration of contents of enclosure Petitioner’s failure of selection by the FY 02 Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Board. As he did not request removal of his FY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08441-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation differently than others...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08464-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08468-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given the existence of such a disorder, and your suicidal thoughts, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08473-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2003. In addition, it considered the comments of your counsel After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08490-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08491-01
(2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the contents of enclosure following corrective action. the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 8491-01 a. Petitioner was authorized payment of per diem for the period 24 February 2000 through 4 August 2000. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08500-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Enlistment Bonus (EB). Fireman, and therefore is not entitled to an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08501-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ‘McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08503-00
accused admitted to him that he had kissed Mrs. (Later) the accused apologized for kissing Mrs. (S), but claimed that the kiss was consensual and was initiated by Mrs. (S). kiss on her, kiss . until she raised the accusation that I forced a when in fact it was she that initiated the I also stated to the general that it was I disagree with the finding that a friend of her husband and one (S) ever leave the house ._ QMl (D) based his .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08505-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08506-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: lc Docket No: 8506-01 17 July 2002 From: To: Subj : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08510-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08511-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from his Naval Reserve enlistment contract incident to his appointment to the Naval Academy on 29 June 1953 so as to establish credit for pay (longevity) purposes. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mimer, Pauling, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08519-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08522-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and injustice on 16 October determined that the corrective action...