DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BJG
Docket No: 8376-02
15 November 2002
_JSMC
Dear Serg
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
consisted of your application,
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review
Board (PERB), dated 23 September 2002 with attachment, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
PERB. They also noted that the Marine Corps Total Force System entry
in the report of the
2001;
attached to the
the contested fitness report for 1 March 2001 to 18 February 2002 stated you were removed
on 20 December 2001. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
PERB report showed you were assigned to weight control on 17 January
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
In this regard, it is
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-S 103
Y
REPLY REFER
TO:
IN
1610
MMER/PERB
SEP
2
3
2002
MEMORANDUM
FOR THE EXECUT
NAVAL
IVE DIRECTOR,
RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Subj:
Ref:
MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD
ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF
SERGEAN
USMC
(PERB)
(a) Sergeant
(b)
(c)
MC0
MC0
P1610.7E
P1610.7E
w/Ch 1
w/Ch l-2
DD Forms
149(3) of 2 Apr 02
Per
MC0
1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board,
1.
with th
Sergean
the following fitness reports was requested:
s present, met on 18 September 2002 to consider
etition contained in reference (a).
Removal of
a.
b.
C .
Report A
- 991106
to 000331 (AN)
- Reference
(b) applies
Report B
- 001118 to 010228 (TR)
- Reference (c) applies
Report C
- 010301 to 020218 (CD)
- Reference (c) applies
The petitioner contends that during the periods covered by
2.
the challenged fitness reports she was never officially assigned
to the Weight Control Program.
by the absence of appropriate unit diary entries.
her appeal,
of "Weight Control 113 Remarks"
Force System (MCTFS),
issue.
To support
the petitioner furnishes her own statements, a copy
and copies of the fitness reports at
from the Marine corps Total
This, she believes is confirmed
In its proceedings,
3.
reports are administratively correct and procedurally complete
The following is offered as relevant:
as written and filed.
the PERB concluded that all three
a.
The issue surrounding all three reports was the
petitioner's failure to meet established Marine Corps
height/weight/body fat standards.
situation and commented accordingly on Report A.
Reports B and C are concerned,
of rebuttal on both evaluations,
the accuracy of the recorded information.
She was aware of this
the petitioner omitted statements
thereby passively concurring in
As far as
Subj:
MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD
ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF
SERGEANT
USMC
(PERB)
b.
Lacking any evidence to the contrary,
the
::it%-a
f4CTTS, the Board presumes the
abs~nco of
Anot
;n
cntr;cs
ctandlng
two commands involved in these reports complied with the proper
procedures for the petitioner 's assignment to the Weight Control
Program.
entry does not somehow
assignment or the information
fitness reports.
error nor an injustice.
That the assignment was not recorded via unit diary
invalidate the accuracy of either the
contained in the challenged
the Board discerns neither an
To this end,
The Board's opinion,
4.
vote,
of
is t
Sergean
based on deliberation and secret ballot
ested fitness reports should remain a part
icial military record.
5.
The case is forwarded for final action.
Evaluation Review Board
Personnel Management Division
Manpower and Reserve Affairs
Department
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
2
GYS33'G ENTER NEXT SSN:
N
COMPANY CODE:
PLT CODE: STAF
ENTER CATG:
,c
NBR :
06:12:16
y:7‘Th
(r>
TRNGRP:
RECSTAT: 0
R-RECSTAT:
COMP CODE: 11
RCOMP CODE:
SSN:
RUC: 06115
SEQ
00002
KILL
DATE
999999
00001
999999
20000504 20000510 3
FROM
20010117
TO
oc)o3oooo
4
WCC ADR TYP-DOC#-YEAR-RUC-DPI-TTC
TCH DATE
B: 1-00132-2002-06115-02-0337-20020709
E: 1-00132-2002-06115-02-0337-20020709
B: 1-00022-2000-45502-03-0337-20000514
E: 1-00124-2000-45502-03-0339-20000605
t*
PFl
******************
- HELP
PF3
COMPLETE
- EXIT TO TRMK MENU
D
********************
PFl2
- LOCAL PRINT
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04575-01
of the report. 1070 JAM8 A& 2 7 ‘LUJi MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL IN THE CASE OF STAFF SERGEANT SMC LICATION We are asked to provide an opinion on Petitioner's request 1. for the removal from his service record book (SRB) and official military personnel file (OMPF) of all entries related to the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) he received on 16 November 1999. the Petitioner admit receiving NJP, but other command...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04197-02
Report A - 990827 to 991231 (AN). Report C - 000630 to 001231 (AN). Evaluation Review Board, request for May 2002 to consider Staff removal of his fitness report for the period 010101 to 010209 Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive (CH).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03738-02
petitioner's assignment to the Military Appearance Program was correctly included on the fitness reports. As with Report A, the adversity of Report B was that he was assigned to the Military Appearance Program. rmance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04541-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner states that on the day the report was written yet had never been placed 2. he was reported as being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08072-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. height, weight, and body fat as He was also not within established Marine Corps 73", 227 pounds, and The report at issue reflects the petitioner's weight standards for his 19%, Subi: J MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD ADVIS SERGE E CASE OF STAFF USMC (PERB) respectively (over...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10846-02
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Y 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08674-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 27 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation The petitioner contends the report is substantively 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06836-02
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 1610 MMER/PERB JUL 2 4 20@ MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD NAVAL RECORDS FOR CORRECTION OF Sub; : MARINE CORPS ADVISORY OPINION ON MASTER SERGEAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE BOARD (PERB) OF SMC Ref: (a) (b) MSg MC0 P1610.7E DD Form 149 of w/Ch 1 14...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08637-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05074-02
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 June 2002, a copy of which is attached. 8 o MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...