Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08492-02
Original file (08492-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 
WASHINGTON DC

2 

ANNEX

 

20370-5100

JLP : ddj
Docket No: 8492-02
14 January 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1560 MRV, a copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

’

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280  RUSSELL ROAD
GUANTICO. VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:

156 0
MRV

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

had an opportunity to be enrolled in the

(MGIB) program but declined.

Montgomery GI Bill  
information is contained in the Marine Corps Total Force System,
(MCTFS) which downloads to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Under Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C., eligible Marines are
automatically enrolled in the MGIB upon their initial entry on
active duty unless they exercise their option to disenroll.

This

The DD Form 2366 which Sgt

2.
understands that he is eligible for the MGIB, that he will be
automatically enrolled,

but that if he elects to disenroll, "the

signed, states that he

nroll WILL NOT be available" at a later date.
Sgt
decision to decline participation in the MGIB is, by

federal law, irrevocable.

3.
Based on the information that ha
recommends that no change be made to

My point of contact f

4 .
can be reached at DSN 278-9550

or

, this office
record.

.and

784-9550.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06667-06

    Original file (06667-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC memorandum 1560 MRRV of 31 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05172-98

    Original file (05172-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. To have been eligible,- been on active duty and a participant in VEAP on 9 Oct 96.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04649-03

    Original file (04649-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record .and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He further stated that had he known about the 180 days of enlistment to be eligible he would have stayed in the Marine Corps.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00510-06

    Original file (00510-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    510-06 10 May 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02

    Original file (05347-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03538-02

    Original file (03538-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 Y S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:yrj Docket No: 9 July 2002 3538-02 Dear This is in reference to provisions of title IO of‘ your application the IJnitctl St;ltc‘s Ior- (‘wlc~. correction 01‘ your 1552. \cction n;~\#al record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board your application accord;tnce with tar Correclion 9 on adniinist panel A three-member session, considered were reviewed in proceedings of this Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01732-07

    Original file (01732-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1732-07 1 May 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The DD Form dated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10578-07

    Original file (10578-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10578-07 22 Jan 08 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your nava1 record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2008. Unless a member brings the MGIB pay problem to the attention of their military pay office, it will go unresolved, either deducting money when the member declined MGIB enrollment or not deducting money when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06010-08

    Original file (06010-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VEAP era Service members were allowed to convert and contribute to the MGIB program during two conversion periods in 1996 and 2001, if they opened and made contributions to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06969-02

    Original file (06969-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...