Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08441-01
Original file (08441-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 8441-01
7 February 2002

Your allegations of error and

While

after review by the discharge

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 4 November
1998 after more than eight years of prior active service.
your record does not contain the separation processing documents,
it appears that the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with a general discharge by reason of alcohol
rehabilitation failure and,
authority, the recommendation was approved.
shows that you were discharged on 25 February 2000 with a general
discharge by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.
time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol
rehabilitation 
differently than others discharged for that reason/the Board
could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the
RE-4 reenlistment code.
denied.
furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

The record clearly
At that

.failure.

Since you have been treated no

since you did not ask for such

The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07577-01

    Original file (07577-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07453-01

    Original file (07453-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,.considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08119-02

    Original file (08119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. after review by the discharge Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03126-02

    Original file (03126-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that on 30 March 1990 you received You reported to active duty on 18 April On 7 February 1991 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an honorable discharge by reason of alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08334-01

    Original file (08334-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03926-05

    Original file (03926-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 2002. Subsequently, you were found to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00129-02

    Original file (00129-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. separation for alcohol rehabilitation failure was provided by the mental health department to your commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06211-01

    Original file (06211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations. so discharged on 13 November 1998. reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code You were You were not recommended for You have provided evidence that since discharge, you have completed an alcohol rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04516-08

    Original file (04516-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given your misconduct, alcohol rehabilitation failure, and the fact that the separation authorities were ordered to issue you an RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08161-05

    Original file (08161-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the reason for discharge to secretarial plenary authority because you were never diagnosed as alcohol dependent.In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were notsufficient to warrant a change in the reason for discharge, given your continuing alcohol problem as shown by the diagnosis of alcohol...