DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 8364-02
21 January 2003
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the
for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
nited States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of
session, considered your
injustice were reviewed
applicable to the
consisted of your
naval record and applicable tatutes, regulations and policies.
applicatio
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
on 16 January 2003. Your allegations of error and
cordance with administrative regulations and procedures
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
insuyficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
evidence submitted was
injustice.
The Board found that you were released from active duty on 31 May 1956 and transferred to
the Temporary Disability Retired List
(TDRL). You were reevaluated during March 1958,
and found fit for duty. You were honorably discharged on 30 April 1958, after you declined
to demand a formal hearing before the Physical Evaluation Board, or to accept the Marine
Corps’ offer of reenlistment in the rank of sergeant. As you were not on active duty during
the 31 May 1956-30 April 1’358 period, you were not entitled to a DD Form 214 to cover
that period of service.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was erroneous, the Board
was unable to recommend
ar.y corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The namer and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
circ
It is regretted that the
taken. You are entitled to
.stances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
tve the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
applyi g for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
i
material evidence or other
important to keep in mind
Consequently, when
applicant to demonstrate th existence of probable material error or injustice.
atter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
at a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05040-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 November 1956 you received NJP for The punishment The punishment imposed was 10 On 13 February 1957 you were convicted by summary court-martial of failure to obey a lawful order and damaging government property. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07101-01
denied your request for a hardship discharge. On 30 June 1958 the Bureau of Naval Personnel On 11 A second special court-martial convened on 10 October 1958 and convicted you of an unauthorized absence of about 42 days, missing ship's movement and breaking arrest. Your request for a The Board Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04663-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 7 February 1958 you received NJP for failure to The punishment imposed was The punishment imposed was a reduction you were convicted by summary court-martial On 22 February 1958, of two instances of breach of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06105-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. About six months later, on 13 May 1957, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of a 38 day period of UA. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service, belief that you received a bad conduct (BCD) or dishonorable (DD) discharge,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02801-01
This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects However, during -_ On...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02218-02
officer recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness. were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00595-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative' regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record reflects that on 25 October 1956 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a two day period of unauthorized absence You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 15 days and a $30 forfeiture...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08116-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. During your enlistment, you received four disciplinary actions for periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totaling more that five days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. included an unauthorized absence of 24 days and drunk and disorderly conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03688-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, the Board concluded that you were fortunate to have received a general discharge since Sailors discharged with a record of misconduct,...