DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX
NAVY
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
TJR
Docket No: 8364-01
18 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
and policies.
opinions furnished by the Department of Mental Health Services,
Naval Medical Center, a copy of which is attached.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
In this regard, the Board substantially
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the
Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval
Council of Personnel Boards, attention:
Board, Building 36, Fourth Floor, Washington Navy Yard, 901 M
Street, S. E., Washington,
upgrade of your discharge and a change in your narrative reason
for discharge.
DC 20374-5023 for consideration of an
Naval Discharge Review
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
2
DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER
SAN DIEGO, CA 92134
.‘\ddrcsscc:
From:
Suljject:
Cll;lil~lllil~~,
h’a\y,
Ijo;lrd for Correction Of
20370-5 100
1X
\Vashington,
IY;l\‘ill
R~COI-(IS,
I~~~~il~tIll~llt
tllC!
Of
Comtncnts and
I~cco~lltllcncl;\tions in
the
case of former SMSN,
IISN,
08364-03
(a) Docket No:
(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
1.
of
Reference (a) requests a psychiatric
correction
higher, and to dispute the diagnosis
enclosures (1). (2) and
her record to upgrade her
(3), and
revie\\- of the petitioner ’s request
RE-3
of a personality disorder. 1 have reviewed
101
from DD 214 to an
reentry code
01
offer the following comments.
2.
I will review some of the
histor>~:
3 1
OCT96
31 OCT96
JUN 1998
SEP 1998
Anslvered “no” to having or ever having had
Enlistment Physical:
Depression or excessive worry. Frequent indigestion, or Stomach,
liver or intestinal trouble. Answered “no” to ever having
attempted suicide.
Enlistment Physical: Acknowledges having been rejected for
military service for having failed ASVAB in January 1996, El
Paso, TX
Questionnaire for National Security Positions: Answered “no” to
having consulted, in the previous 7 years, with a mental health
professional, or another health care provider about a mental health
related condition.
MEDEVAC off USS Kitty Hawk to San Diego during ship ’s
deployment because she “could not handle the stress of the ship,
was not able to exercise when she wanted, the food was making
her sick, and she had suicidal thoughts. ” She was treated for one
month at the mental health clinic (records not included in BCNR
File), North Island, and returned to the ship fit for full duty.
MEDEVAC off USS Kitty Hawk (now home ported in Yokosuka,
Japan) for the same reasons as above. She received treatment by a
Na$ Psychiatrist at USNH Yokosuka, and diagnosed with an
eating disorder not otherwise specified. She remained in
L 14’;1~1”90
2
1
SCX’TW
05JLJLOO
27 JUNO1
says
the
he1
ol‘this
evali~ation,
she
wmaincd
ship. and
\vill not eat
symptoms
\vithout
treatment prior
A t
t he time
“ilnmoti\~atcil
that
slit
a history
does not and
of‘thc
t‘ollo\ving
lo enlistment in
\vhcn
01‘ irresponsible alcohol use), and at least
&ntinucd active duty. states that nothing has changed about
the
\vas elicited:
a
sclf-
of‘tlic
fbod.” In addition.
of‘entitlcnicnt and unreasonable
expectations. unstable
cmotionnl instability. self-harming behavior (including
objects
Yokosuka on Limited Duty Status from December 1998 until
found lit for full duty by 25 August 1999.
Mental Health Evaluation, Ship’s Psychologist. USS Kitty
llawk
in accordance with DOD Directive 6490.1, and DOD Instruction
6490.4: service member reported a history of anorexia- and
huliniia-like
Na\,\..
for
dislike
ship’s
scnsc
image.
starvation. self-induced vomiting. hitting and kicking
angry, and a past history
five occasions
medications.
could have led to her suicide (including overdose of
trying to drown herself. and contemplating jumping off a cliff or
from the 09 level of‘ the ship). She was diagnosed with the
Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified
f’ollowing: Axis I:
(Existed Prior to Entry); Alcohol Abuse (By History, Not Current);
Axis 11: Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with
pel
Narcissistic and Borderline Traits; Axis III: Gastric Problems
Medical Record. She was found at the time of this evaluation to bc
psychologically unsuitable for continued military service due to a
personality disorder. and
administrative separation.
Separation Physical: Answered “yes” to having attempted suicide
prior to enlistment.
Psychiatric Evaluation for consideration of waiver for former
service member to enlist in the United States National Guard,
bet\f.een the ages of 18 and 23 of behavior that
\\as recommended for expeditious
R/o Post 1995-96 history of anorexia/unspecified
GAF=80-85). Recommendation: “Psychiatrically cleared
Medical Corps, United States Army.
Findings were as follows: Impression: “No emotional or mental
disorder.
personality disorder in complete remission. ” Prognosis: “Good
(current
for reentry to military service/Waiver highly encouraged.”
Psychological Assessment: Actuarial personality evaluation. Tests
included Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Hopelessness Scale,
Beck Anxiety Inventory,
Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II,
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-II. Interpretation of
test results concluded that there were mild to moderate anxiety
symptoms; mild symptoms of depression on one scale, but none on
two others; minimal feelings of hopelessness; and no evidence of
personality disorder or disturbance on the MCMI-2 and MMPI-2
protbcols.
3. Discussion: There are several details that cannot be considered due to unavailable
se\rerity
I
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600053
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION It is therefore predictable he will not be effective in the performance of his duties. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00529
The CI’s reported minimum weight was 96% of the minimum expected weight based on the minimum normal BMI and remained above 85% of the MLIC desirable weight (133.5 pounds). Other than anorexia nervosa, no other ratable mental conditions were forwarded to the PEB for adjudication by the MEB psychiatry evaluation. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr....
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501424
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Although this Marine is being evaluated for possible personality disorder the basis for this separation request is only “eating disorder” (see 26 March medical evaluation). The basis for this recommendation is her diagnosis of severe Eating Disorder, as supported by CDR M_ (Psychiatrist) evaluations of 26 Mar 03, 3 Feb 03, 7 Jan 03, 18 Dec 02 and 16 Dec 02.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01176-01
1171 (b) Board for Correction of Naval Record letter of 7 August 200 1 (1) BCNR File (2) Service record (3) Medical records (4) VA records Per your request for review of the subject response to reference documentation of the charges that led to non-judicial punishment was provided in this packet. ” As a result, the 1: 1 watch was discontinued, and the patient was returned to full duty with instruction to take the provider appointment. He also endorsed a history of at least two episodes of...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600099
ND06-00099 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051012. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). It was then that another discharge was recommended, but this time the Captain signed it.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05703-00
e. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 30 July 97, Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital Oak Harbor, documenting on Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Dysthymia, and on Axis II: Dependent and Avoidant Traits 3. Review of the service record revealed: entered the service on 18 August 94 in Portland, Oregon. There is no evidence of a mental illness present at the time of separation that rendered the service member disabled or unlit for increased risk of suicide...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600203
ND06-00203 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051116. This was known throughout my department and that was the reason DTI P_ advised me to report to the off base hospital instead of our ship that night. Denied knowledge of (family psychiatric) history.
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00670
ND04-00670 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040317. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Because the medical officer has indicated he may accidentally or intentionally harm himself or others in an attention seeking gesture (medical document provided), I have expeditiously discharged SN M_ (Applicant) on 19 September 1991, with a discharge characterized as type warranted by...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00124
Her physician at the time of discharge now states that she is completely better and supports her decision to return to the Air Force as long as she is not returned to her previous Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of security forces. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged for unsuitability, due to Adjustment Disorder and maladaptive personality traits, on 6 Jun 03, after 2...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00621
CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “The US Air Force separated me with Severance Pay based on a 10% rating for “Anxiety Disorder." The VA reviewed the same medical records that the Air Force used. The commander’s statement noted that the CI could not perform any of his AFS duties due to mental stress yet his performance review of nearly 2 years did not reference any bizarre behavior and actually exceeded his duty expectations.