NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07531-02
1552 149~ w/attachments (1) DD Form (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1 (3) Subject ’s naval record l/5 10 of 10 December 2002 Pursuant to the provisions 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the PN (TAR) rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07532-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD OUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2001 2 +, SEP MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07533-02
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 21 October 2002, a copy of which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07535-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removal of the contested fitness reports for 1 January to 16 June 1996 and 2 August to 31 December 1996. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07544-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07545-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that her record be corrected by moving 12 retirement points from the anniversary ending on 3 August 2000 into the anniversary year ending 3 August 1999. Y b. Petitioner's application was filed in a timely manner. Although there are no guarantees that she will be able to This will raise the total in the anniversary year ending 3 she...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07547-02
In addition, the Board considered the undated advisory opinion with enclosure furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached. MMPR MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: Encl: ASE OF MASTER SERG MC (a) MMER Route Sheet of 3 Ott 02 (1) Military Personnel Procurement Branch reply to r dated 14 Jul 60 MSgt Reference Sergea in the case of 1. s requesting Master information as to why he never reached his goal of becoming...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07560-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07562-02
You your commander date of rank from 1 November 1995 to 1 November 1998. record pursuant to the requested adjustment of A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07564-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07564-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB College Kicker.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07565-02
Documentary material considered by the Board Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 19 July 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07566-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7566-02 17 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07570-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07577-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07579-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 1974 the suspended bad conduct discharge was ordered executed due to this period of absence. in the discharge being executed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07583-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.. McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07585-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07590-01
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. In response to reference (a), record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor lan (SBP) prior to transferring to the Fleet Reserve on recommend BCNR not correct PO1 5 November 1974. Public Law 92-425, which enacted SBP on 21 September 1972, provided that a retiree's participation in SBP at the maximum level was automatic unless...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07596-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the RM rating; and to backdate the effective date of advancement to IT2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07597-01
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The psychiatrists concluded, in part, that after review of the record and mental health evaluations, Petitioner's diagnosed schizophrenia was a significant factor in the misconduct that led to his discharge, and Petitioner's characterization of service should be reconsidered. This disorder does not Had 2 CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07600-02
10 of the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were awarded confinement at hard labor paygrade E-2, and forfeitures of On 23 March 1971, you commenced a second period of authorized absence that did not terminate until you were apprehended by civilian...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07601-02
McBride, McPartlin, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed r and injustice on 8 October 2002 and, pursuant to its he corrective action indicated below should be taken on the material considered by the Board consisted of the applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07603-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his request dated 12 August 1985 for reassignment for humanitarian reasons “and all personal information involving this package.” Copies of pertinent documents appearing in Petitioner’s official microfiche record are at Tab A. (2), PERS-4OHH, the Navy Personnel c. In correspondence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07609-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the Board could not tell if you The Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment and such a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07610-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Date of Rank (DOR) as Sergeant reflect all his prior service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 05 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07613-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards dated 26 August 2002, a copy of which is attached, and the comments of your counsel. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This letter responds to reference (a) which requested comments and a recommendation regarding Petitioner's request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07614-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone OS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07617-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 August 1983 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and on 30 August...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07620-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07628-02
2002 In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance C. over the subject matter of Petitioner ’s request to strike his failures of selection for promotion before the FY 2001 and 2002 CW04 Selection Boards has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. ith Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps HEADQUART2RS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07629-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone MM rating (NEC 423 1). The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07630-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07631-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 21 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07635-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The court sentenced you to confinement at hard forfeiture of $482 per month for four You received the bad In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all However, the Board concluded that these factors potentially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07635-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Tew, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07644-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 18 February 2000. Pauling, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07645-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. The Board found that you served in the Navy from 8 to 30 July 2000, when you were discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07647-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or paygrade accession via the PRISE III program, except for the AECF, injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07649-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected by moving retirement points from the anniversary year ending 22 June 2000 to the anniversary year ending 22 June 2001. Since he is so close to earning a qualifying year and the circumstances were beyond his control, the Board concludes that four retirement points should be transferred from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07654-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. that you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07661-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07671-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grover, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07675-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07676-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, you have not submitted any Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged based on a diagnosed personality disorder. The Board believed that your difficulties adapting to the Navy and the adverse performance evaluation were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07680-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07684-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 7684-02 13 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show termination of Survivor Benefit Plan...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07687-00
The Board, consisting of Ms. Moidel and Messrs. Carlsen and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board notes that Petitioner had an excellent career in the Navy for many years, that his decline in performance may have been related...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07687-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light of...