Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07656-02
Original file (07656-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 7656-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
a copy of which is attached.

32/6206 of 12 November 2002,

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

L

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE

5722 INTEGRITY DR.
 
38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
12 NOV 02

32/6206

From:
To:

Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

USN;

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 07656-02

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
the applicant enlisted under the PRISE III program.
paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is E-3.  
not reenlisting within six months of discharge and  
in the previously held rating are not eligible for reenlistment
in prior paygrade.

The maximum
NAVETs
not,enlisting

Per reference (a)

PRISE III is a rating conversion program designed to enlist

2.
Navy veterans into hard to fill ratings.
NAVETS reenlisting to be reduced in rate because of manning
issues, whether they are reclassified or not.
Time in rate is
always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS
returning in a lower paygrade.
waivers authorized.

There are no exceptions or

It is not uncommon for

3.

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02

    Original file (07972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02

    Original file (01395-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02

    Original file (04780-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00744-02

    Original file (00744-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOh4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08025-02

    Original file (08025-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 16 October 2002 802502 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. the applicant enlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03647-02

    Original file (03647-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07260-02

    Original file (07260-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00327-02

    Original file (00327-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application oh 1 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6059 of 23 April 2002, a NAVCRUITCOR4 ~llemo~-antlum 1 133 Ser After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01333-02

    Original file (01333-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02208-02

    Original file (02208-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    mh MEH: Docket No: 2208-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the IJnitetl States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the OI,I for accord;mce with A three-member panel of the Hoard session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of this application, together with applicable statutes, opinion...