Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07533-02
Original file (07533-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

  RECORD

S

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 7533-02
19 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered   your application on 19 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse
’s naval
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 21 October 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

’

,t.-

21 

Ott 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

(a) BCNR Pay  

memo of   20 Sep  02

Per reference (a),

1.
CPO Roberts'
Benefit Plan (SBP).

recommend the BCNR not correct

record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor

2.

The recommendation is based on the following:

ransferred  to the Fleet Reserve on

He did not enroll in the Retired Serviceman's

Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) at that time.
3 February 1985.

He died

b.

The RSFPP was a voluntary, contributory program, which

required participants to contribute a small portion of their
retired pay.

This program was replaced by the SBP.

Additionally,

The first was during the widely publicized

had two opportunities to enroll in the SBP
t.

C .
after h
initial Open Enrollment period of 21 September 1972 to
20 September 1973.
during the 1 0
Unfortunately,
opportunities.
(RAS)  each tim
least one annually which identified him as a non-participant in
the SBP,
Additionally,
which was provided to
regarding the  

to 30 September 1982 open season.
did not take advantage of these
s received a Retiree Account Statement
a change in his retired pay and at

yet he took no action to enroll his spouse.

(the Navy quarterly newsletter)

he had one other opportunity

"Shift Colors"

SBP open season enrollment

periods.

outinely contained information

3.
There are no other provisions under federal law that permit
payment of an SBP annuity to the spouse of deceased retiree who
is not enrolled in this plan.

Program Manager
Survivor Benefit Plan
Retired Activities and GI Bill
Programs Branch (PERS-664)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02423-02

    Original file (02423-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He did not elect to enroll his Petty Officer was offered "Shift Colors" (the retirees' quarterly newsletter) regularly 3. provides...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00877-02

    Original file (00877-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Chief Petty enrolled Ms. (SBP) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05261-03

    Original file (05261-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. packages explaining the program and offering them an opportunity to enroll in the SBP during the 2 20 September 1973 open season.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04

    Original file (01778-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09997-07

    Original file (09997-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 22 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03211-07

    Original file (03211-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)2. A~ditiona1ly, “Shift Colors” (the Navy’s quarterly retiree newsletter) was provided to him and contained information regarding~ the aforementioned

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07810-02

    Original file (07810-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCPO Benefit Plan (SBP) using his full retired pay as his base amount prior to transferring to Fleet Reserve. The recommendation is based on the following: a. SCPO transferred to the Fleet Reserve on He enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) 31 August 1980. spouse only coverage category at the minimum base amount of $300.00. The enclosure indicates b. and he had two other opportunities ?had three subsequent opportunities to base amount for the SBP after his The first was during the 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065549C070421

    Original file (2001065549C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM military records show: He retired before the SBP was established; however, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in either of the two previous survivor benefit programs available to him.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08279-07

    Original file (08279-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 7 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02

    Original file (09563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.