DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No:
17 December
7570-02
2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 6 November 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
Y
1780
PERS-604
6 Nov 02
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
NAVAL RECORDS
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)
(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 28
(b) Title 38,
Ott 02
United States Code, Chapter 30
The following is provided in response to reference (a).
n the
did not
im of
(
sup
1.
Recommend denial of
Montgomery GI Bill
provide any substantial evidence to
inaccurate information,
he was
review of
disenrolle
reference (b),
to1
there is insufficient reason to believe
ose his benefits upon commissioning. A
aster microfiche record indicates he
Per
GIB Program on 24 August 1994.
the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.
2.
PERS-604's point of contact is PNC
at (DSN) 882-4259 or (C) 901-874-4259.
ho can be reached
Head, Retired Activities and
GI Bill Program Branch
PERS-604)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10927-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06360-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06323-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Docu~nentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If briefing official where the alleged miscounseling occurred stating he provided incorrect information during his brief, a more favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07839-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03684-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (b), VEAP was closed to new enrollments on Members 'who did not enroll before these request to enroll (VEAP).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07169-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend denial of Madntgomery GI Bill (MGIB the master microfiche record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program on 19 June 1999. disenroll is irrevocable. Until Congress changes the law to allow members a opportunity to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07842-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04593-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00094-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment) . Additionally, since XXX was not a VEAP participant, he was not eligible for conversion to the MGIB Program.