Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07577-01
Original file (07577-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 
14 February 

7577-01
2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 February 2002.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1995 at
age 19.
processing documents,
recommended that you be separated with an honorable discharge by
reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and, after review
by the discharge authority,
The
record clearly shows that you were discharged on 31 January 1997
with an honorable discharge by reason of alcohol abuse
rehabilitation failure.
reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol
rehabilitation failure.
differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board
could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the
RE-4 reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
furnished upon request.

While your record does not contain the separation
it appears that the commanding officer

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

the recommendation was approved.

At that time, you were assigned a

Since you have been treated no

._

The Board did not consider whether your reason for discharge
should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration
and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying
You may apply to
to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03926-05

    Original file (03926-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 2002. Subsequently, you were found to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03126-02

    Original file (03126-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that on 30 March 1990 you received You reported to active duty on 18 April On 7 February 1991 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an honorable discharge by reason of alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08441-01

    Original file (08441-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation differently than others...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07453-01

    Original file (07453-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,.considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09809-02

    Original file (09809-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to On 29 September 2001 At that time, you The offenses included waive the right to present your case to an administrative After review by the discharge authority, the Since you have been treated no differently than the Board could not find an error or The names and Applicable regulations require the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08334-01

    Original file (08334-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08119-02

    Original file (08119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. after review by the discharge Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00129-02

    Original file (00129-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. separation for alcohol rehabilitation failure was provided by the mental health department to your commanding officer. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08161-05

    Original file (08161-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed the reason for discharge to secretarial plenary authority because you were never diagnosed as alcohol dependent.In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were notsufficient to warrant a change in the reason for discharge, given your continuing alcohol problem as shown by the diagnosis of alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04612-01

    Original file (04612-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged because of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.