DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 7560-02
19 November 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 19 November 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. When an individual is evaluated by Physical Evaluation Board and that Board decides
the individual should be discharged based
Detachment must discharge the individual by a given date.
active duty to qualify for benefits he would not otherwise be entitled to receive.
were discharged from the Navy is correct.
Accordingly, your application has
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
0~ the medical evaluation the Personnel Support
The individual cannot be retained on
The date you
been denied. The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01451-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2002. You were considered physically qualified for separation on 19 November 1959, and you were honorably discharged by reason of unsuitability on that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03920-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed with a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06502-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07565-02
Documentary material considered by the Board Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 19 July 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00787-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05014-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted Board. Based on these findings and your and a personality disorder with Additionally, you revealed The On 6 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04193-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require an entry level separation in almost all cases in which an individual is separated or processed for separation within the first 180...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03327-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board concluded that these factors Therefore, the Board Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05522-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00387-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...