DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
Docket No: 7547-02
4 December 2002
Dear Master Serg
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the undated advisory opinion with enclosure furnished by Headquarters Marine
Corps, a copy of which is attached. They also considered your rebuttal letter dated
10 November 2002 with enclosures.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. The second paragraph of the enclosure to the advisory opinion
indicates there is
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
no law requiring selection boards to give reasons for their determinations.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
copy to:
The Honorable Tim Hutchinson
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
221.W51&l
LEJFXJNE
ROAD
ppp-jY$~ER
TO.
MMPR
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
ASE OF MASTER SERG
MC
(a) MMER Route Sheet of 3
Ott 02
(1) Military Personnel Procurement Branch reply to
r dated 14 Jul 60
MSgt
Reference
Sergea
in the case of
1.
s requesting
Master
information as to why he never reached his goal of becoming an
officer in the Marine Corps.
ed an advis
aster Serge
2.
The following facts are germane to this case:
a.
b.
Sergea
set
plied for warrant officer,
Master
ant, and Limited Duty Officer
temporary
(LDO) programs on several occasions. However, Promotion
Branch (MMPR-1) has no record of Master
receiving an appointment to warrant officer, temporary
second lieutenant or LDO.
Sergea
Enclosure (1) provides additional information why
Master
an officer in the Marine Corps.
r reached his goal of becoming
Sergea
The
3.
Singlet0
s matter is Capt
motion Section
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04639-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05129-02
JEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANT ICO, V IRGINIA 221 34-51 0 3 : IN REPLY REFER TO 1610 MMER/PERB MAY ltitil 0 3 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APP SERGEAN E CASE OF STAFF USMC (a) (b) SSgt MC0 P1610.7D s DD Form 149 of 15 Jan 02 w/Ch 1-4 Per MC0 1610.11C, 1. with three members...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05454-02
application with supporting documents his for removal of the request 118(11) page 11 entry MC0 P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. fitness report that Staff Sergeant to provide counseling for personal and the a page 11 counseling should have no counseling is accomplished to overcome The event, were found in my record, The page 11 entry, not the iciencies. F 118(11) page 11 entry for removal Staff 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03738-02
petitioner's assignment to the Military Appearance Program was correctly included on the fitness reports. As with Report A, the adversity of Report B was that he was assigned to the Military Appearance Program. rmance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 MEMORANDUM FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06881-99
They were unable to find how, if at all, his report influenced your nonjudicial punishment or your removal from the 1998 staff sergeant selection list, nor could they find how he changed his opinions following the review of his report by the CO. We reviewed Sergeant documents concerning his Administrative Remarks page 11 entries dated 980804 and 981125, Offenses and Punishment page 12 entry dated 990311 and CMC letter 1450/3 MMPR-2 dated 2. In view of the above, it is recommended...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-00
The petitioner has offered absolutely no documentary that he missed only six hours of class Finally, while paragraph nine of enclosure (5) to evidence whatsoever to prove his allegations that his absences were due to medical reasons or that the report itself contains "false statements" (i.e., vice 60). The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and recommendations for corrective found, and states that Sergeant to make a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08696-02
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 27 September 2002, a copy of which is attached. and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation The petitioner states the challenged report is "undeserved", 2. yet provides no statement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04822-99
The adverse letter qualifies as "other reports, or correspondence of a military nature" per paragraph b . d. The adverse letter was the result of a report to CMC Sergean Sergean (MMPR-2) by known by this Divis rebutted by 4. provide advisory opinion and recommendations. the adverse fitness report precipitated the adverse letter.